Website review, no card needed
spcc.sa website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202642 issues · 82 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on spcc.sa, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 6.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 182 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 180 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 245 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
14.4 s · 8.3 MB136 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.3 MB).
Render-blocking requests
8.0 s46 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.0 s.
Reduce unused CSS
5.1 s · 890 KiBAbout 890 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.5 s · 793 KiBAbout 793 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify JavaScript
310 ms · 51 KiB51 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 748 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,921 HTML elements
The page has 1,921 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Google Fonts and others), adding 362 KiB and 213 ms of main-thread time.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 151 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
10 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Improve image delivery
7 KiB1 image could be 7 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 256 ms
256 msYour server sent the HTML in 256 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.1 s
9.1 sReal visitors wait 9.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.3 s
5.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sThe first text or image appears after 8.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.0 s
24.0 sYour largest element takes 24.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “معتمدون من كبرى الجهات والهيئات، ونحافظ على أعلى مستويات ال…”.
Time to Interactive: 24.2 s
24.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 274 ms
274 msReal visitors wait 274 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 34% slower for real visitors
+34%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 182 ms to 245 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 45% slower for real visitors
+45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 6.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 205 ms
205 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 205 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.8 MB in 153 requests
8.8 MBYour homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 153 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (42), media 1.8 MB (1) and scripts 1.5 MB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images in older formats
11 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (128 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.51 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.51 g of CO₂e: 300.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 70 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (27 characters)
Your title is only 27 characters: “شركة أسمنت المنطقة الجنوبية”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
113 internal links, 30 external
The homepage links to 113 pages on spcc.sa and 30 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “أسمنت المنطقة الجنوبية شريك البناء في تحقيق رؤية السعودية 2030”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://spcc.sa/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://spcc.sa/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://spcc.sa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://spcc.sa/%d8%b9%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d9%85%d8%ac%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d9%84%d8%ac%d8%a7%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%ac%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d8%af%d9%88%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d9%85%d8%ac%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d8%b1%d8%b3%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a9-%d8%b1%d8%a6%d9%8a%d8%b3-%d9%85%d8%ac%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9 and https://spcc.sa/%d8%b1%d8%b3%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d8%a6%d9%8a%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%86%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%b0%d9%8a and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages with very little text
https://spcc.sa/%d8%b9%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d9%85%d8%ac%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d9%84%d8%ac%d8%a7%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%ac%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d8%af%d9%88%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d9%85%d8%ac%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9, https://spcc.sa/%d8%b1%d8%b3%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a9-%d8%b1%d8%a6%d9%8a%d8%b3-%d9%85%d8%ac%d9%84%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a9 and https://spcc.sa/%d8%b1%d8%b3%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d8%a6%d9%8a%d8%b3-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%86%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%b0%d9%8a and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to font at 'https://w15w.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/google-fonts/fonts/notokufiarabic-csrk4ydqnpyadxexlff6…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 14 words
The homepage has only about 14 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at spcc.sa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Hetzner
Company
- Founded
- 1977
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on spcc.sa, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.