Website review, no card needed
srhc.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202648 issues · 96 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on srhc.com, 20 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 95 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
23.1 s · 18.7 MB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (18.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
14.3 s · 16.6 MB22 images could be 16.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 553 KiBAbout 553 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and perfalytics.com and others), adding 1.0 MB and 402 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 70 KiBAbout 70 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 33 KiB33 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 206 ms
206 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 206 ms of main-thread work and 434 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 151 ms
151 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 151 ms of main-thread work and 416 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 20 KiB20 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 116 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
16 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 490 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 29 ms
29 msYour server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 64.5 s
64.5 sYour largest element takes 64.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Home page banner”.
Speed Index: 28.7 s
28.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 28.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 67.8 s
67.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 67.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.6 s
6.6 sThe first text or image appears after 6.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
29 images without width and height
29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 104 ms
104 msReal visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 419 ms
419 msReal visitors wait 419 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 168 ms
168 msScripts block the page for only 168 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.6 MB in 72 requests
19.6 MBYour homepage downloads 19.6 MB in 72 requests on a phone: images 18.4 MB (32), scripts 1.1 MB (13) and stylesheets 106 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images over 500 KB
7 images weigh 14.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
7 images far larger than shown
13.0 MB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Nckmed.jpg at 3,360 px wide, shown at 264 px. Resized copies would save about 13.0 MB.
18 images in older formats
18 images (15.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
16 images below the first screen load straight away
16 images further down the page (14.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.6 g of CO₂ per visit
5.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.55 g of CO₂e: 666.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
18 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
16 tap targets too small
16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “Salina Regional Health Center”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
22 links with vague text
22 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://srhc.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at srhc.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
47 internal links, 32 external
The homepage links to 47 pages on srhc.com and 32 external pages.
1 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “Salina Regional Health Center, Inc. provides full service medical care offering 24/7 ER care and a variety of specialty…”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://srhc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (376 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages share a title
/, https://srhc.com/about-us, https://srhc.com/services, https://srhc.com/health-education, https://srhc.com/physician-directory and https://srhc.com/careers/careers.php and 9 others all use the title “Salina Regional Health Center”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://srhc.com/about-us, https://srhc.com/services, https://srhc.com/health-education, https://srhc.com/physician-directory, https://srhc.com/careers/careers.php and https://srhc.com/organizational-development/student-internships.php and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://srhc.com/physician-directory has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
43 small tap targets
43 of 70 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 262 words of copy
The homepage carries about 262 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register for the Fe For A Cure Race/Walk” and “Sign Up Today”.
25 calls to action
The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Register for the Fe For A Cure Race/Walk” and “Sign Up Today”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at srhc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cox Communications Inc.
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Job board
- careers page
Company
- Employees
- 2,174
- Founded
- 1995
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on srhc.com, including 15 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.