Website review, no card needed
ssgbd.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202648 issues · 74 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on ssgbd.com, 17 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 189 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
37.4 s · 15.0 MB80 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (15.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
30.5 s · 13.2 MB48 images could be 13.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 30.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.4 s · 948 KiBAbout 948 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
780 ms · 174 KiBAbout 174 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 780 ms faster on a phone.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.2 MB and 703 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 750 ms.
YouTube adds 550 ms
550 msYouTube costs a phone 550 ms of main-thread work and 987 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.0 s
6.0 sReal visitors wait 6.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.75
0.75For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.75 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 72.0 s
72.0 sYour largest element takes 72.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Promotional Popup”.
Speed Index: 18.0 s
18.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 74.1 s
74.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 74.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.864
0.864The layout shifts by 0.864 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 49% slower for real visitors
+49%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 189 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 68% slower for real visitors
+68%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 5.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
33 images without width and height
33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 338 ms
338 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 338 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 184 ms
184 msReal visitors wait 184 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 696 ms
696 msReal visitors wait 696 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.5 MB in 119 requests
16.5 MBYour homepage downloads 16.5 MB in 119 requests on a phone: images 14.2 MB (80), scripts 1.7 MB (7) and other files 209 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
43 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example footer-overlay-28qviuzS.png at 894 px wide, shown at 179 px. Resized copies would save about 43 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (67 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (67 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit
4.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.66 g of CO₂e: 559.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
24 text elements with low contrast
24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
9 tap targets too small
9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Super Star Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (239 characters)
Your meta description is 239 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ssgbd.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ssgbd.com/backend/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://ssgbd.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 101 words
The homepage has only about 101 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download Catalogue” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ssgbd.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Super As Ap Super Star Electronics Limited
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on ssgbd.com, including 22 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.