Website review, no card needed
stabexinternational.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202638 issues · 77 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on stabexinternational.com, 19 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 7.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 142 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
2.0 s
3.1 s
4.1 s
5.1 s
6.1 s
7.1 s
8.2 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.4 s · 2.1 MB9 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.9 s · 860 KiB61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (860 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 177 KiBAbout 177 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 65
65/100Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 82). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 78 KiBAbout 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 565 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 20 KiB20 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 19 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
1 checks passed
Server response: 20 ms
20 msYour server sent the HTML in 20 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 8.6 s
8.6 sReal visitors wait 8.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.7 s
17.7 sYour largest element takes 17.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (11.0 s).
Time to Interactive: 17.8 s
17.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.6 s
6.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.8 s to 7.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 67 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 67 requests on a phone: images 4.2 MB (17), fonts 400 KiB (7) and scripts 384 KiB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images in older formats
10 images (3.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (667 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
93 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example lubes.jpg at 1,320 px wide, shown at 403 px. Resized copies would save about 93 KiB.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 173.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
33 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 33 pages on stabexinternational.com and 6 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Stabex International Ltd – Powering Your Performance”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://stabexinternational.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://stabexinternational.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (232 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
https://stabexinternational.com/about/who-we-are, https://stabexinternational.com/about/our-leadership-team, https://stabexinternational.com/fuel, https://stabexinternational.com/gas, https://stabexinternational.com/card and https://stabexinternational.com/sta-shop and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 pages without an H1
https://stabexinternational.com/about/who-we-are, https://stabexinternational.com/about/our-leadership-team, https://stabexinternational.com/fuel, https://stabexinternational.com/gas, https://stabexinternational.com/card and https://stabexinternational.com/sta-shop and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://stabexinternational.com/stabex/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/black.woff' because its …”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 170 words
The homepage has only about 170 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Online Shop”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stabexinternational.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Reliablesite
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on stabexinternational.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.