Website review, no card needed

stac.edu logo

stac.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on stac.edu, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 36.0 MB in 109 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 241.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
167 ms105 msMay 9Oct 24112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026123 ms
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026143 ms
Jun 13, 2026160 ms
Jun 20, 2026151 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026119 ms
Jul 18, 2026117 ms
Jul 25, 2026124 ms
Aug 1, 2026127 ms
Aug 8, 2026132 ms
Aug 15, 2026127 ms
Aug 22, 2026121 ms
Aug 29, 2026120 ms
Sep 5, 2026115 ms
Sep 12, 2026114 ms
Sep 19, 2026116 ms
Sep 26, 2026119 ms
Oct 3, 2026121 ms
Oct 10, 2026119 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of stac.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. stac.edu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. stac.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. stac.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. stac.edu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. stac.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. stac.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. stac.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. stac.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix48
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 393 KiB

    About 393 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 199 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (199 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 12.1 MB

    6 images could be 12.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, wpmucdn.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 671 ms

    671 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 671 ms of main-thread work and 659 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 903 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 54 KiB

    About 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 196 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 29 ms

    29 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.6 s

    18.6 s

    Your largest element takes 18.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “IGNITE YOUR PASSION Ignite What’s Next. Imagine all you can…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.3 s

    19.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 976 ms

    976 ms

    Real visitors wait 976 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 341 ms

    341 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 341 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Real visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 36.0 MB in 109 requests

    36.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 36.0 MB in 109 requests on a phone: media 21.4 MB (7), images 13.3 MB (31) and scripts 1.1 MB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    STAC-Campus-Aerial-new.jpg weighs 11.9 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    11.9 MB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example STAC-Campus-Aerial-new.jpg at 13,500 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 11.9 MB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (12.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (12.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 10.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.20 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.20 g of CO₂e: 1223.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9093
  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Links must have discernible text (5 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 23 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 91 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 91 pages on stac.edu and 20 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Aspire.Achieve.Imagine. What’s your big dream? At St. Thomas Aquinas College, we dare you to imagine all that you can a…”.

  • Title: 36 characters

    Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “Welcome | St. Thomas Aquinas College”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://stac.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, Person and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://stac.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://stac.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (702 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://stac.edu/events has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://stac.edu/.

  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 511 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 511 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register Now”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Start Chat”, “Apply” and “Request Info”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Matomo.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 28 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stac.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Matomo
Hosting
Vultr

Company

Employees
337
Founded
1952

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on stac.edu, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25