Website review, no card needed

staffzone.com logo

staffzone.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202634 issues · 84 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on staffzone.com, 12 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms102 msMay 9Oct 24115 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026105 ms
May 16, 2026106 ms
May 23, 2026106 ms
May 30, 2026106 ms
Jun 6, 2026106 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026105 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026108 ms
Jul 25, 2026109 ms
Aug 1, 2026109 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026109 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026110 ms
Sep 5, 2026110 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026109 ms
Sep 26, 2026109 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 2026116 ms
Oct 17, 2026114 ms
Oct 24, 2026115 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of staffzone.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. staffzone.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. staffzone.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. staffzone.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. staffzone.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. staffzone.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. staffzone.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. staffzone.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  8. staffzone.com at 7.1 s7.1 s

Speed

9 to fix48
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.8 s

    84 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.6 s · 671 KiB

    About 671 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.8 s · 355 KiB

    About 355 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.2 s · 245 KiB

    4 images could be 245 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 222 KiB

    118 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (222 KiB).

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.2 MB and 571 ms of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 558 ms

    558 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 558 ms of main-thread work and 981 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 933 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 228 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Your largest element takes 15.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Apply Now For Available Daily Assignments Apply Now For Ava…”.

  • Speed Index: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 337 ms

    337 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 337 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Real visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 709 ms

    709 ms

    Real visitors wait 709 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.036

    0.036

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.036, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 12.6 MB in 140 requests

    12.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.6 MB in 140 requests on a phone: media 9.8 MB (1), scripts 1.1 MB (8) and images 921 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (65 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (32 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.56 g of CO₂e: 427.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9196
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Home - Staff Zone”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (382 characters)

    Your meta description is 382 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 27 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on staffzone.com and 20 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Testimonials”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://staffzone.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://staffzone.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://staffzone.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (437 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://staffzone.com/support-team and https://staffzone.com/workers-app/support all use the title “Support - Staff Zone”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://staffzone.com/directors and https://staffzone.com/our-management-team use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://staffzone.com/executive-team, https://staffzone.com/directors, https://staffzone.com/our-management-team, https://staffzone.com/support-team, https://staffzone.com/staffing-services and https://staffzone.com/construction-staffing and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix81
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 35 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 374 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 374 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Now For Available Career Openings”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Apply Now For Available Career Openings” and “Apply Now”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at staffzone.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
IONOS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on staffzone.com, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25