Website review, no card needed

starindocleaning.com logo

starindocleaning.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202637 issues · 82 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on starindocleaning.com, 19 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of starindocleaning.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. starindocleaning.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. starindocleaning.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. starindocleaning.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. starindocleaning.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. starindocleaning.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. starindocleaning.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  7. starindocleaning.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. starindocleaning.com at 7.6 s7.6 s

Speed

7 to fix35
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10.3 s · 4.7 MB

    83 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.7 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 1.3 MB

    16 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.9 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.9 s).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 184 KiB

    About 184 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    830 ms · 90 KiB

    About 90 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 830 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Google Analytics), adding 344 KiB and 146 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    170 ms · 3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 93 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 60 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 441 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix36
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.6 s

    22.6 s

    Your largest element takes 22.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.2 s

    23.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.7 s

    13.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.68

    0.68

    The layout shifts by 0.68 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 52 ms

    52 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 52 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 92 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 92 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (25), scripts 551 KiB (33) and fonts 316 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    univac.jpg weighs 755 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    100 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example dulevo-d3.jpg at 1,350 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 100 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (126 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.43 g of CO₂e: 171.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7486
  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 10 images without alt text

    10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7768
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://starindocleaning.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 37 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 37 pages on starindocleaning.com and 5 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “PT Starindo Cleaning Technologies – Solusi Kebersihan Terpadu”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://starindocleaning.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://starindocleaning.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (285 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/history, https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/milestones, https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/vision-missions, https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/organization-structure, https://starindocleaning.com/products/municipal-areapublic-space-cleaning-equipment and https://starindocleaning.com/products/commercial-and-industrial-area-cleaning-equipment and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/history, https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/milestones, https://starindocleaning.com/who-we-are/organization-structure, https://starindocleaning.com/news-events, https://starindocleaning.com/contact and https://starindocleaning.com/career have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://starindocleaning.com/career took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 269 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 269 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at starindocleaning.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2019.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on starindocleaning.com, including 13 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25