Website review, no card needed

stetig.in logo

stetig.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202642 issues · 81 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on stetig.in, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of stetig.in (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. stetig.in at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. stetig.in at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. stetig.in at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. stetig.in at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. stetig.in at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. stetig.in at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. stetig.in at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. stetig.in at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

7 to fix68
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.0 s · 1.3 MB

    56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    650 ms · 434 KiB

    About 434 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 523 KiB

    29 images could be 523 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 33). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    610 ms · 66 KiB

    About 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 498 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Maps, Google CDN and Google Fonts), adding 178 KiB and 137 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    40 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix73
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 44 images without width and height

    44 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 8 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    185 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example SalesforceSummitPartner.png at 2,514 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 185 KiB.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (335 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (372 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.38 g of CO₂e: 46.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.4 MB in 68 requests

    1.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 68 requests on a phone: images 906 KiB (48), scripts 271 KiB (6) and fonts 118 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 6081
  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used (1 element)

    <marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h1 → h5 and h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 25 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8270
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Prepareforspectacular Sales”, “Get readyforsplendid service” and “Embrace the #1 : Salesforce CRM”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at stetig.in/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 22 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on stetig.in and 2 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Stetig | Salesforce CRM Summit Partner”.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://stetig.in/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://stetig.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (488 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 6 pages share a title

    /, https://stetig.in/contact.php, https://stetig.in/about.php, https://stetig.in/team.php, https://stetig.in/services.php and https://stetig.in/Policy.php all use the title “Stetig | Salesforce CRM Summit Partner”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://stetig.in/contact.php, https://stetig.in/wearehiring.php, https://stetig.in/about.php, https://stetig.in/team.php, https://stetig.in/services.php and https://stetig.in/Policy.php have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 internal pages checked

    We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 8870
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://stetig.in/images/companylogo/20_321%20Foundation.jpg.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: “100K+ Users”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 312 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 312 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Join Us”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stetig.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2023.

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on stetig.in, including 12 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25