Website review, no card needed
stwcorp.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202632 issues · 82 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on stwcorp.com, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
850 ms · 2.4 MB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 831 KiBAbout 831 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Google Maps and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
1.1 MB6 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
YouTube adds 682 ms
682 msYouTube costs a phone 682 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 358 ms
358 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 358 ms of main-thread work and 419 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 226 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
126 KiBAbout 126 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 41 ms
41 msYour server sent the HTML in 41 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 17.2 s
17.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sYour largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Trusted People and Results, Driven from the Ground Up”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.7 s).
First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s
3.7 sThe first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.3 s
6.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 484 ms
484 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 484 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 79 ms
79 msReal visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 85 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (22), scripts 1.7 MB (25) and fonts 133 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (48 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 142.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
12 H1 headlines
There are 12 <h1> headlines (“Trusted People and Results, Driven from the Groun…”, “HeavyHighway” and “Commercial & Residential Site Work”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
60 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 60 pages on stwcorp.com and 6 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 36 characters
Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “ST Wooten – Trusted People & Results”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.stwcorp.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.stwcorp.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.stwcorp.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (365 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.stwcorp.com/heavy-highway, https://www.stwcorp.com/commercial-and-residential, https://www.stwcorp.com/engineering-and-design-build, https://www.stwcorp.com/ready-mix-concrete, https://www.stwcorp.com/hot-mix-asphalt and https://www.stwcorp.com/ez-street-ambient-asphalt and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.stwcorp.com/projects took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://www.stwcorp.com/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure stylesheet 'http…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 294 words of copy
The homepage carries about 294 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY NOW”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Apply Now” and “Learn More & Apply”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stwcorp.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Charter Communications Inc
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on stwcorp.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.