Website review, no card needed

stxnext.com logo

stxnext.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202633 issues · 84 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on stxnext.com, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 243.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
217 ms100 msMay 9Oct 24154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026131 ms
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026126 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026125 ms
Jun 13, 2026124 ms
Jun 20, 2026127 ms
Jun 27, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026114 ms
Jul 11, 2026113 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026126 ms
Aug 1, 2026133 ms
Aug 8, 2026133 ms
Aug 15, 2026148 ms
Aug 22, 2026167 ms
Aug 29, 2026170 ms
Sep 5, 2026179 ms
Sep 12, 2026181 ms
Sep 19, 2026171 ms
Sep 26, 2026203 ms
Oct 3, 2026203 ms
Oct 10, 2026174 ms
Oct 17, 2026171 ms
Oct 24, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of stxnext.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. stxnext.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. stxnext.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. stxnext.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. stxnext.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. stxnext.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. stxnext.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  7. stxnext.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. stxnext.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

11 to fix36
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.2 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.2 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 724 KiB

    About 724 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 680 KiB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (680 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    960 ms · 160 KiB

    About 160 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 960 ms faster on a phone.

  • website-files.com adds 538 ms

    538 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 380 ms

    380 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 380 ms of main-thread work and 505 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hubspot adds 247 ms

    247 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 317 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,603 HTML elements

    The page has 2,603 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 194 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Your largest element takes 13.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.7 s

    19.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 860 ms

    860 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 860 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 131 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 156 ms

    156 ms

    Real visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 547 ms

    547 ms

    Real visitors wait 547 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 29.4 MB in 108 requests

    29.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 29.4 MB in 108 requests on a phone: media 26.3 MB (7), scripts 2.0 MB (30) and images 688 KiB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    6a6487e133086439cff4ca3d_green-circle-glow.svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 8.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.32 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.32 g of CO₂e: 998.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 28 tap targets too small

    28 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (109 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 109 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 222 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10089
  • Title is long (69 characters)

    Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “AI/ML, Data, and AI-Augmented Software Development Company | STX Next”.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • 150 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 150 pages on stxnext.com and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Modern Data, AI, and Cloud solutions for enterprise and mid-sized companies in the Financial Services, Industrial, and …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Engineered for what’s next”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.stxnext.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.stxnext.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.stxnext.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,323 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 913 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 913 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “GET IN TOUCH”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “GET IN TOUCH” and “TALK TO OUR EXPERTS”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 31 testimonial or review blocks, 137 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 3 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stxnext.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Company

Headquarters
Poznań

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on stxnext.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25