Website review, no card needed
summerhillhomes.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202644 issues · 89 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on summerhillhomes.com, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 123 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
51.1 s · 9.3 MB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
37.8 s · 6.6 MB15 images could be 6.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 37.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 1.6 MBAbout 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, LivePerson and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 146 KiBAbout 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 560 ms
560 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
LivePerson adds 287 ms
287 msLivePerson costs a phone 287 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 387 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,839 HTML elements
The page has 1,839 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 65 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 54.0 s
54.0 sYour largest element takes 54.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies and third-party services to enhance your exp…”.
Time to Interactive: 54.0 s
54.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 54.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 123 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.071
0.071The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.071, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.7 MB in 58 requests
12.7 MBYour homepage downloads 12.7 MB in 58 requests on a phone: images 9.2 MB (20), scripts 2.7 MB (21) and other files 353 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images over 500 KB
7 images weigh 6.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
15 images far larger than shown
4.6 MB15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Courts 4 Website.jpg at 2,965 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 4.6 MB.
17 images in older formats
17 images (9.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Courts 4 Website.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.59 g of CO₂e: 431.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
96 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 96 pages on summerhillhomes.com and 24 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “New Homes For Sale in Foster City, Los Gatos, Monte Serrano, Mountain View and Santa Clara, California by an award winn…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “New Homes in the San Francisco Bay Area”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “New Homes in the San Francisco Bay Area | SummerHill Homes”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.summerhillhomes.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.summerhillhomes.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,170 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.summerhillhomes.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://www.summerhillhomes.com/media-gallery has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 19-field form
Your longest form asks for 19 fields (9 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 243 words
The homepage has only about 243 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Communities Contact”, “Corporate Contact” and “Quick Sign up”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at summerhillhomes.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on summerhillhomes.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.