Website review, no card needed

sunshinebouquet.com logo

sunshinebouquet.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202639 issues · 80 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on sunshinebouquet.com, 19 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
102 ms87 msMay 9Oct 2494 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 202694 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202689 ms
Jul 25, 202689 ms
Aug 1, 202692 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202698 ms
Sep 12, 202699 ms
Sep 19, 202698 ms
Sep 26, 2026100 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 202697 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sunshinebouquet.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sunshinebouquet.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sunshinebouquet.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sunshinebouquet.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. sunshinebouquet.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sunshinebouquet.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sunshinebouquet.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sunshinebouquet.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. sunshinebouquet.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix59
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    11.6 s · 3.0 MB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    5.8 s · 1.3 MB

    8 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 231 KiB

    About 231 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    850 ms · 191 KiB

    About 191 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 62 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 187 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 240 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 35 ms

    35 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.9 s

    14.9 s

    Your largest element takes 14.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Direct From Our Farms 3”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.118

    0.118

    The layout shifts by 0.118 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix40
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    SBC_2019_Logos_Color_Vector_Horizontal.png weighs 1,019 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    1,012 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example SBC_2019_Logos_Color_Vector_Horizontal.png at 5,330 px wide, shown at 150 px. Resized copies would save about 1,012 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 37 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 37 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (13), scripts 454 KiB (10) and fonts 277 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (226 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.92 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8792
  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “Sunshine Bouquet |”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Direct From Our Farms”, “The Sunshine Difference” and “KaszinoHungary10 – A Magyarországi Online Kaszinó…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 27 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on sunshinebouquet.com and 10 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://sunshinebouquet.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sunshinebouquet.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://sunshinebouquet.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (604 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://sunshinebouquet.com/about-us, https://sunshinebouquet.com/our-farms-2, https://sunshinebouquet.com/roses-2, https://sunshinebouquet.com/market-bunches-2, https://sunshinebouquet.com/vase-arrangements-3 and https://sunshinebouquet.com/blog-3 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://sunshinebouquet.com/vase-arrangements-3, https://sunshinebouquet.com/blog-3, https://sunshinebouquet.com/category/featured, https://sunshinebouquet.com/category/flower-care, https://sunshinebouquet.com/category/flower-facts and https://sunshinebouquet.com/category/flower-fun and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7793
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 399 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 399 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sunshinebouquet.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
IONOS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on sunshinebouquet.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25