Website review, no card needed

supdeco.sn logo

supdeco.sn website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202650 issues · 88 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on supdeco.sn, 14 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.2 s3.3 sMay 2Oct 174.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.5 s
May 9, 20264.5 s
May 16, 20264.7 s
May 23, 20265.4 s
May 30, 20265.5 s
Jun 6, 20265.9 s
Jun 13, 20265.9 s
Jun 20, 20265.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.7 s
Jul 4, 20264.3 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.1 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.3 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.4 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.5 s
Oct 17, 20264.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
168 ms123 msMay 2Oct 17162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026131 ms
May 9, 2026128 ms
May 16, 2026137 ms
May 23, 2026141 ms
May 30, 2026144 ms
Jun 6, 2026152 ms
Jun 13, 2026139 ms
Jun 20, 2026143 ms
Jun 27, 2026140 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026142 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026140 ms
Aug 1, 2026140 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026143 ms
Aug 22, 2026142 ms
Aug 29, 2026141 ms
Sep 5, 2026140 ms
Sep 12, 2026147 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026159 ms
Oct 3, 2026163 ms
Oct 10, 2026159 ms
Oct 17, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of supdeco.sn (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. supdeco.sn at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. supdeco.sn at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. supdeco.sn at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. supdeco.sn at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. supdeco.sn at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. supdeco.sn at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. supdeco.sn at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. supdeco.sn at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 2.3 MB

    78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    31 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 64). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    720 ms · 86 KiB

    About 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 720 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Maps and others), adding 721 KiB and 581 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    438 KiB

    6 images could be 438 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    431 KiB

    About 431 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Font display

    400 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,847 HTML elements

    The page has 1,847 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 159 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    23 KiB

    23 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Real visitors wait 4.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.27

    0.27

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.27 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.8 s

    10.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.371

    0.371

    The layout shifts by 0.371 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 131 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Your largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “SCIENCES, INGÉNIERIE ET INFORMATIQUE”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.0 s).

  • Total Blocking Time: 371 ms

    371 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 371 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 142 ms

    142 ms

    Real visitors wait 142 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 103 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 103 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (18), scripts 1.1 MB (39) and fonts 318 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (533 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (533 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    76 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Supdeco-Campus-Banjul-celebre-sa-cinquieme-promotion.jpeg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 76 KiB.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.79 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.79 g of CO₂e: 94.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8588
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (39 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 39 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 9 form fields without a label

    9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9276
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (86 characters)

    Your title is 86 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Groupe Supdeco Dakar | École de Management, Informatique & Transport Logistique, droit”.

  • Meta description is long (164 characters)

    Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 363 internal links, 46 external

    The homepage links to 363 pages on supdeco.sn and 46 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://supdeco.sn/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://supdeco.sn/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://supdeco.sn/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,009 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://supdeco.sn/nos-missions-visions-et-valeurs, https://supdeco.sn/pres-de-30-ans-au-service-de-lafrique, https://supdeco.sn/les-atouts-du-groupe-sup-de-co, https://supdeco.sn/reconnaissances-et-accreditations, https://supdeco.sn/nos-campus and https://supdeco.sn/experience-etudiante-a-sup-de-co have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 168 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 51 small tap targets

    51 of 72 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()”.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 348 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 348 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at supdeco.sn, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Founded
1993

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on supdeco.sn, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25