Website review, no card needed

superfeet.com logo

superfeet.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202639 issues · 94 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on superfeet.com, 13 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 311.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
149 ms126 msMay 16Oct 31146 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026136 ms
May 23, 2026130 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026132 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026146 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026146 ms
Jul 25, 2026145 ms
Aug 1, 2026141 ms
Aug 8, 2026140 ms
Aug 15, 2026140 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026142 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026142 ms
Oct 3, 2026145 ms
Oct 10, 2026146 ms
Oct 17, 2026146 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms
Oct 31, 2026146 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of superfeet.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. superfeet.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. superfeet.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. superfeet.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. superfeet.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. superfeet.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. superfeet.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  7. superfeet.com at 7.0 s7.0 s
  8. superfeet.com at 8.0 s8.0 s

Speed

14 to fix34
  • Improve image delivery

    19.8 s · 4.6 MB

    6 images could be 4.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 19.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Azure Web Services adds 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Azure Web Services costs a phone 1.9 s of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 12.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 12.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    27 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Azure Web Services, Google Tag Manager and alia-prod.com and others), adding 3.7 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 2.3 MB

    About 2.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 MB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.9 MB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.2 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 702 ms

    702 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 702 ms of main-thread work and 577 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • alia-prod.com adds 596 ms

    596 ms

    alia-prod.com costs a phone 596 ms of main-thread work and 792 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 441 ms

    441 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 441 ms of main-thread work and 505 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Osano CMP adds 367 ms

    367 ms

    Osano CMP costs a phone 367 ms of main-thread work and 80 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,827 HTML elements

    The page has 1,827 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    41 KiB

    About 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    39 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    36 KiB

    36 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    16 KiB

    16 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 29.4 s

    29.4 s

    Your largest element takes 29.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 51.4 s

    51.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 51.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 138 ms

    138 ms

    Real visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 437 ms

    437 ms

    Real visitors wait 437 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.051

    0.051

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.051, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix25
  • Page weight: 11.6 MB in 432 requests

    11.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.6 MB in 432 requests on a phone: images 5.3 MB (43), scripts 4.3 MB (133) and other files 1.1 MB (198). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    US_11-4_Hero_Mobile.webp weighs 5.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (5.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    US_11-4_Hero_Mobile.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    279 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example US_11-4_Hero_Mobile.webp at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 279 KiB.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.29 g of CO₂e: 395.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9494
  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 23 links without text

    23 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 51 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“”, “Be Generous” and “Be Game-Changing”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 181 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 181 pages on superfeet.com and 18 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Discover Superfeet insoles & inserts designed to improve foot health & comfort. Enjoy better support, stability & align…”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Premium Insoles For Comfort & Pain Relief – Superfeet Worldwide”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.superfeet.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.superfeet.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.superfeet.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (888 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.superfeet.com/pages/insole-finder is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.superfeet.com/pages/insole-finder has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.superfeet.com/pages/insole-finder has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://www.superfeet.com/cdn/shop/t/240/assets/disclosure.css?v=81815' because its MIME t…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    33 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix89
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 316 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 316 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try Our Insole Finder” and “Shop Now”.

  • 24 calls to action

    The homepage has 24 calls to action, for example “Try Our Insole Finder”, “Shop Now” and “Learn More”.

  • 10 short forms

    10 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and a star rating.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 38 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at superfeet.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Employees
168
Headquarters
Ferndale

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on superfeet.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25