Website review, no card needed
superkicks.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202641 issues · 91 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on superkicks.in, 16 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 27. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71C- #80,970 of 99,896 reviewed websitesbeats 16%
- #48,150 of 54,869 online storesbeats 10%
- #44,611 of 49,812 Shopify storesbeats 9%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 172 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 195 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.4 s
3.5 s
4.7 s
5.9 s
7.1 s
8.2 s
9.4 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.6 s
A phone's processor spends 6.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
5,293 HTML elements
The page has 5,293 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 MBAbout 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, gokwik.co and verifast.ai and others), adding 3.4 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
703 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (703 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 335 ms
335 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 335 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 345 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
335 KiB8 images could be 335 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
shopflo.co adds 85 ms
85 msshopflo.co costs a phone 85 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
gokwik.co adds 190 ms
190 msgokwik.co costs a phone 190 ms of main-thread work and 506 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 88 KiBAbout 88 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 41 KiB41 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
59 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Duplicated JavaScript
17 KiB17 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 21 ms
21 msYour server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s
9.9 sYour largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 27.1 s
27.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.2 s
14.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.36
0.36The layout shifts by 0.36 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 883 ms
883 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 883 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 255 ms
255 msReal visitors wait 255 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 172 ms to 195 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 601 ms
601 msReal visitors wait 601 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.5 MB in 450 requests
8.5 MBYour homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 450 requests on a phone: images 3.6 MB (140), scripts 2.8 MB (88) and other files 1.7 MB (175). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
divalibannermob_1.gif weighs 1.6 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images in older formats
4 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
m_9646512f-c830-43fb-b33e-f6000f4711ef.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images far larger than shown
20 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Bangalore_4bb1a3cf-68a7-4076-8ad8-0d073b532411.jpg at 390 px wide, shown at 119 px. Resized copies would save about 20 KiB.
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.42 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.42 g of CO₂e: 289.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
5 buttons without a name
5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
18 images without alt text
18 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
25 links without text
25 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (9 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
54 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “SOCIAL MEDIA”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (173 characters)
Your meta description is 173 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
8 links crawlers can't follow
8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
316 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 316 pages on superkicks.in and 3 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Superkicks India - Buy Premium Sneakers & Shoes Online in India”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.superkicks.in/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.superkicks.in/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,531 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.superkicks.in/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.superkicks.in/collections/all, https://www.superkicks.in/collections/featured-collection, https://www.superkicks.in/collections/running-shoes-for-women and https://www.superkicks.in/collections/ballet have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 151 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 third-party cookies
6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
188 of 194 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 503 words of copy
The homepage carries about 503 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Start shopping”, “Contact us” and “Order & Shipping”.
7 short forms
7 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, 20 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
42 cookies set on arrival
42Opening the homepage sets 42 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at superkicks.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on superkicks.in, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.