Website review, no card needed
superseedsonline.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202644 issues · 92 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on superseedsonline.com, 16 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 107 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.6 s
4.2 s
4.8 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s26 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
950 ms · 1.8 MB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Maps adds 238 ms
238 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 238 ms of main-thread work and 455 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
200 ms · 194 KiB3 images could be 194 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Maps, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google Fonts and others), adding 478 KiB and 239 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
234 KiBAbout 234 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 52 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 62. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
6 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 6 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 406 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 88 ms
88 msYour server sent the HTML in 88 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.9 s
5.9 sReal visitors wait 5.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.54
0.54For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.54 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.723
0.723The layout shifts by 0.723 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 10.8 s
10.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.0 s
5.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sYour largest element takes 3.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 102 ms
102 msReal visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 29% faster for real visitors
-29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 1 ms
1 msScripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.3 MB in 68 requests
2.3 MBYour homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 68 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (14), scripts 524 KiB (28) and fonts 105 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images in older formats
8 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.65 g of CO₂e: 78.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
27 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at http://www.superseedsonline.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
8 links crawlers can't follow
8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
133 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 133 pages on superseedsonline.com and 5 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Super Seeds | SUPER SEEDS (P) LTD.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is http://www.superseedsonline.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.superseedsonline.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (660 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.superseedsonline.com/products and https://www.superseedsonline.com/product-category/field-crops have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 119 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 409 words of copy
The homepage carries about 409 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Apply On-line” and “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at superseedsonline.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2015.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on superseedsonline.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.