Website review, no card needed

surgestaffing.com logo

surgestaffing.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202648 issues · 85 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on surgestaffing.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms120 msMay 16Oct 31131 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026123 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026131 ms
Jul 11, 2026133 ms
Jul 18, 2026135 ms
Jul 25, 2026137 ms
Aug 1, 2026137 ms
Aug 8, 2026138 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026140 ms
Aug 29, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026139 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026134 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms
Oct 17, 2026132 ms
Oct 24, 2026133 ms
Oct 31, 2026131 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of surgestaffing.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. surgestaffing.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. surgestaffing.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. surgestaffing.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. surgestaffing.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. surgestaffing.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. surgestaffing.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. surgestaffing.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. surgestaffing.com at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

11 to fix60
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    27.2 s · 20.8 MB

    52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    18.9 s · 8.8 MB

    11 images could be 8.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 18.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.0 s · 819 KiB

    About 819 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.4 s · 259 KiB

    About 259 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and userway.org and others), adding 2.0 MB and 917 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google CDN adds 426 ms

    426 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 426 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 328 ms

    328 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 519 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 155 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 26 ms

    26 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 26 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 39.3 s

    39.3 s

    Your largest element takes 39.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 41.4 s

    41.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 41.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 947 ms

    947 ms

    Real visitors wait 947 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 272 ms

    272 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 272 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Real visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 23.2 MB in 93 requests

    23.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 23.2 MB in 93 requests on a phone: images 11.4 MB (39), media 8.0 MB (2) and scripts 1.7 MB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images over 500 KB

    7 images weigh 8.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    1.6 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example forbes-award.webp at 4,500 px wide, shown at 165 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (9.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (5.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 6.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.57 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.57 g of CO₂e: 788.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9592
  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 18 images without alt text

    18 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9275
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “SURGE Staffing | National Leader in Staffing & Workforce Solutions”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (171 characters)

    Your meta description is 171 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 57 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 57 pages on surgestaffing.com and 14 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Connecting people with endless work opportunities.”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.surgestaffing.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://surgestaffing.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (760 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://surgestaffing.com/flexibleStaffing, https://surgestaffing.com/fullTimeStaffing and https://surgestaffing.com/directhire all use the title “Full-Time Staffing | SURGE”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://surgestaffing.com/jobsearch, https://surgestaffing.com/how-to-apply, https://surgestaffing.com/benefits.php, https://surgestaffing.com/referralBonus, https://surgestaffing.com/faqs and https://surgestaffing.com/place-staffing-order and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://surgestaffing.com/jobsearch and https://surgestaffing.com/faqs have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • About 283 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 283 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Apply Now”, “How to Apply” and “W-2 Download”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at surgestaffing.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Hosting
Kamatera, Inc.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on surgestaffing.com, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25