Website review, no card needed
sushi.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202641 issues · 85 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on sushi.fr, 17 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 100 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
27.7 s · 11.8 MB83 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11.8 MB).
Improve image delivery
15.7 s · 5.4 MB10 images could be 5.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 15.7 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 39). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Document request latency
600 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 600 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
578 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 578 ms on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
340 ms · 156 KiBAbout 156 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 340 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
450 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 390 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 602 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,708 HTML elements
The page has 1,708 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 678 ms
678 msYour server takes 678 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Reduce unused JavaScript
146 KiBAbout 146 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (sibautomation.com, brevo.com and wonderpush.com and others), adding 177 KiB and 20 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
23 KiB23 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 45.7 s
45.7 sYour largest element takes 45.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 46.7 s
46.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 46.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sThe first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.2 s
11.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.636
0.636The layout shifts by 0.636 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 95 ms
95 msReal visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 59 ms
59 msScripts block the page for only 59 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 15.5 MB in 95 requests
15.5 MBYour homepage downloads 15.5 MB in 95 requests on a phone: images 13.4 MB (32), HTML 1.1 MB (1) and fonts 657 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Rectangle-1655-1.png weighs 588 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image in older formats
1 image (588 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (27 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.4 g of CO₂ per visit
4.39 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.39 g of CO₂e: 526.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
12 images without alt text
12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“NOUVELLE CARTE 2026” and “PLANET SUSHI : LA JAPAN FUSION FOOD QUI REND LE S…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
12 internal links, 190 external
The homepage links to 12 pages on sushi.fr and 190 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “La Japan Fusion Food qui réinvente le sushi depuis 1998 avec une idée simple : faire du japonais un plaisir du quotidie…”.
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Planet Sushi – Restaurant Japonais”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sushi.fr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sushi.fr/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (827 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://sushi.fr/llms.txt (2 KiB, 24 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 internal page checked
We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://sushi.fr/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure font 'http://sushi.fr/w…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 371 words of copy
The homepage carries about 371 words of visible text.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sushi.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Hosting
- OVHcloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on sushi.fr, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.