Website review, no card needed
svicente.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202655 issues · 99 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on svicente.com.br, 26 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
54F- #80,131 of 80,698 reviewed websitesbeats 1%
- #39,661 of 39,721 online storesbeats 0%
- #251 of 257 Salesforce Commerce Cloud storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among Salesforce Commerce Cloud stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 228 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 293 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.4 s
3.5 s
4.7 s
5.9 s
7.1 s
8.3 s
9.5 s
svicente.com.br does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Improve image delivery
1.3 s · 808 KiB43 images could be 808 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 778 KiBAbout 778 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
14,436 HTML elements
The page has 14,436 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 131 KiBAbout 131 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 24
24/100Your mobile performance score is 24. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.2 s
A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 805 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 680 ms
680 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 680 ms of main-thread work and 524 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
290 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (290 KiB).
Google CDN adds 117 ms
117 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 117 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.4 s
6.4 sReal visitors wait 6.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s
10.3 sYour largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 17.8 s
17.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.5 s
9.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 444 ms
444 msReal visitors wait 444 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors
+28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 228 ms to 293 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 31% slower for real visitors
+31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 5.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.216
0.216The layout shifts by 0.216 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
33 images without width and height
33 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 374 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 374 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (316), scripts 1.6 MB (25) and fonts 228 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
61 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example facil-pra-voce.png at 3,356 px wide, shown at 95 px. Resized copies would save about 61 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (30 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.70 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.70 g of CO₂e: 204.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (7 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “São Vicente”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (48 characters)
Your meta description is only 48 characters: “Commerce Cloud Storefront Reference Architecture”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.svicente.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at svicente.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
954 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 954 pages on svicente.com.br and 1 external page.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,081 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /on/demandware.store/Sites-SaoVicente-Site/pt_BR/Page-PageDesigner, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 200 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'find') Object.toggleRequiredFields (https://www.svicente.com.br/on/demand…”.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
271 of 288 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (svicente.com.br).
Valid certificate (171 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for svicente.com.br and is valid for another 171 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://svicente.com.br redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 41 links work
All 41 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 1 external) answered without errors; 4 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
svicente.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
svicente.com.br's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearssvicente.com.br was registered in Jul 2000. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2028
svicente.com.br is registered until Jul 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 4,774 words of copy
The homepage carries about 4,774 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a:production.na01.saovicente.demandware.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
25 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2022.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Oracle Cloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on svicente.com.br, including 27 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.