Website review, no card needed

swan.sk logo

swan.sk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202636 issues · 80 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on swan.sk, 13 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
234 ms84 msMay 9Oct 24104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026217 ms
May 16, 2026208 ms
May 23, 2026197 ms
May 30, 2026188 ms
Jun 6, 2026184 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026172 ms
Jun 27, 2026154 ms
Jul 4, 2026143 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026126 ms
Jul 25, 2026120 ms
Aug 1, 2026114 ms
Aug 8, 2026115 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026110 ms
Aug 29, 2026111 ms
Sep 5, 2026105 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026102 ms
Sep 26, 2026101 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of swan.sk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. swan.sk at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. swan.sk at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. swan.sk at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. swan.sk at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. swan.sk at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. swan.sk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. swan.sk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. swan.sk at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix67
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 1.3 MB

    17 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 70 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (70 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    260 ms · 285 KiB

    About 285 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Google CDN adds 137 ms

    137 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 137 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Google CDN and jQuery CDN and others), adding 851 KiB and 352 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    120 ms · 27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 120 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 380 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Komplexné technologické riešenia”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% slower for real visitors

    +37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Real visitors wait 108 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 546 ms

    546 ms

    Real visitors wait 546 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 51% faster for real visitors

    -51%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 217 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 65 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 88 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 88 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (25), scripts 867 KiB (29) and fonts 110 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    31 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example smile_final.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 31 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (101 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (51 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8189
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 17 images without alt text

    17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7557
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “Váš telekomunikačný operátor”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.swan.sk/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at swan.sk/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 86 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 86 pages on swan.sk and 8 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.swan.sk/.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.swan.sk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (611 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.swan.sk/firmy/internet-a-data/business-internet, https://www.swan.sk/firmy/internet-a-data/managed-wifi, https://www.swan.sk/firmy/internet-a-data/sd-wan, https://www.swan.sk/firmy/internet-a-data/ip-vpn, https://www.swan.sk/firmy/internet-a-data/ethernet-line and https://www.swan.sk/firmy/internet-a-data/ethernet-vpn and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 399 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 399 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at swan.sk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
SWAN, a.s.

Hiring

Hiring
6 open roles
Teams
Engineering (3), Growth (3)
Job board
ashby

Company

Founded
1995
Headquarters
Bratislava

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on swan.sk, including 13 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25