Website review, no card needed
swfc.co.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202652 issues · 85 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on swfc.co.uk, 29 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 126 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
11.3 s · 1.9 MBAbout 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.3 s · 1.9 MB219 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.9 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.9 s · 1.9 MB40 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Main-thread work: 11.1 s
A phone's processor spends 11.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Stripe and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.8 MB and 3.1 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 898 ms
898 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 898 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Stripe adds 668 ms
668 msStripe costs a phone 668 ms of main-thread work and 290 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 592 ms
592 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 592 ms of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
370 ms · 210 KiBAbout 210 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 370 ms faster on a phone.
freshworks.com adds 449 ms
449 msfreshworks.com costs a phone 449 ms of main-thread work and 158 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 462 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,770 HTML elements
The page has 1,770 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 29 ms
29 msYour server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 29.3 s
29.3 sYour largest element takes 29.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 21.5 s
21.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 21.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 35.5 s
35.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.5 s
7.5 sThe first text or image appears after 7.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.7 s
2.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 126 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 124 ms
124 msReal visitors wait 124 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 423 ms
423 msReal visitors wait 423 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 512 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 512 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (225), images 2.6 MB (68) and other files 1.0 MB (206). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (34 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (34 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.94 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.94 g of CO₂e: 232.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (12 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (11 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name (6 elements)
ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.
<td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.swfc.co.uk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.swfc.co.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 76 words
The homepage has only about 76 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at swfc.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2024.
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Founded
- 1867
- Headquarters
- Sheffield
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on swfc.co.uk, including 24 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.