Website review, no card needed

sympla.com.br logo

sympla.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on sympla.com.br, 19 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
376 ms304 msMay 9Oct 24368 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026329 ms
May 16, 2026327 ms
May 23, 2026326 ms
May 30, 2026326 ms
Jun 6, 2026329 ms
Jun 13, 2026329 ms
Jun 20, 2026335 ms
Jun 27, 2026338 ms
Jul 4, 2026336 ms
Jul 11, 2026331 ms
Jul 18, 2026322 ms
Jul 25, 2026316 ms
Aug 1, 2026312 ms
Aug 8, 2026319 ms
Aug 15, 2026326 ms
Aug 22, 2026333 ms
Aug 29, 2026337 ms
Sep 5, 2026338 ms
Sep 12, 2026340 ms
Sep 19, 2026343 ms
Sep 26, 2026347 ms
Oct 3, 2026349 ms
Oct 10, 2026354 ms
Oct 17, 2026361 ms
Oct 24, 2026368 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sympla.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sympla.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. sympla.com.br at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. sympla.com.br at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. sympla.com.br at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. sympla.com.br at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. sympla.com.br at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. sympla.com.br at 7.7 s7.7 s
  8. sympla.com.br at 8.8 s8.8 s

Speed

11 to fix29
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.4 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.1 s

    39 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 29

    29/100

    Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,986 HTML elements

    The page has 3,986 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 601 KiB

    66 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (601 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 525 KiB

    38 images could be 525 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 512 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 321 ms

    321 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 321 ms of main-thread work and 396 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 268 ms

    268 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 268 ms of main-thread work and 256 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 82 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 82 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    18 KiB

    About 18 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 23 ms

    23 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.3 s

    25.3 s

    Your largest element takes 25.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Festival de Verão de Salvador 2027”.

  • Speed Index: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 32.7 s

    32.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 32.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 405 ms

    405 ms

    Real visitors wait 405 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 954 ms

    954 ms

    Real visitors wait 954 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 329 ms to 368 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.049

    0.049

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.049, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 316 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 316 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (66), images 2.8 MB (144) and media 387 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.09 g of CO₂e: 250.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 86 form fields without a label

    86 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8384
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 33 internal links, 37 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on sympla.com.br and 37 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “A Sympla é a maior plataforma de eventos no Brasil. Shows, festas, teatros, stand up, cursos e muito mais. Compre ingre…”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Sympla - Ingressos para Eventos, Teatros, Shows, Cursos e mais”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sympla.com.br/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sympla.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.sympla.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9278
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=343054979&Ver=2&mid=4cfc442c-bfb1-4e65-9524-376f597ef80b&bo=1&sid=b4679a00d3bd11f1b67ad97135c086fc&vid=b467fc30d3bd11f1bff4794e92a792ea&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 29 words

    The homepage has only about 29 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sympla.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on sympla.com.br, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25