Website review, no card needed
synersoft.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202654 issues · 95 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on synersoft.in, 19 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 165 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 309 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 358 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 357 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 350 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 358 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 336 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.5 s
3.0 s
4.6 s
6.1 s
7.6 s
9.1 s
10.7 s
12.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 1.7 MB64 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
840 ms · 804 KiBAbout 804 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 840 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Twitter and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 776 ms
776 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 776 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 313 KiB10 images could be 313 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
540 ms · 119 KiBAbout 119 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 540 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Facebook adds 301 ms
301 msFacebook costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 341 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,761 HTML elements
The page has 1,761 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
20 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 516 ms
516 msYour server sent the HTML in 516 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.6 s
5.6 sReal visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.5 s
5.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 19.2 s
19.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 22.8 s
22.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s
7.2 sYour largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Like physical assets, every enterprise owns digital assets …”. Most of its time is element render delay (7.6 s).
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 325 ms
325 msReal visitors wait 325 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 114% slower for real visitors
+114%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 165 ms to 336 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 377 ms
377 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 377 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.5 s to 5.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB in 144 requests
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 144 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (43), images 1.3 MB (46) and fonts 202 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
12 images in older formats
12 images (854 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (541 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.04 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.04 g of CO₂e: 125.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (10 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
30 links without text
30 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
16 form fields without a label
16 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 14 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “SYNERSOFT”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
9 links with vague text
9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
158 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 158 pages on synersoft.in and 18 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “DATA LOSS PREVENTION”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.synersoft.in/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.synersoft.in/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.synersoft.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,039 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
https://www.synersoft.in/organization, https://www.synersoft.in/about-us/vision-and-mission, https://www.synersoft.in/about-us/team, https://www.synersoft.in/sitemaps, https://www.synersoft.in/partnership and https://www.synersoft.in/media-digital-2 and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.synersoft.in/sitemaps and https://www.synersoft.in/blackbox/blackbox-one-cloud have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages slow to respond
https://www.synersoft.in/organization, https://www.synersoft.in/about-us/team, https://www.synersoft.in/sitemaps, https://www.synersoft.in/partnership, https://www.synersoft.in/media-digital-2 and https://www.synersoft.in/media-interview and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 broken images
3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.synersoft.in/wp-content/uploads/wpcf7_captcha/3552067836.png.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'appendChild')”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,312 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,312 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Demo”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Demo”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 20 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at synersoft.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on synersoft.in, including 24 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.