Website review, no card needed

technibilt.com logo

technibilt.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202636 issues · 84 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on technibilt.com, 10 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s2.4 sMay 2Oct 172.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
106 ms82 msMay 2Oct 1792 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202698 ms
Jun 6, 2026101 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026101 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202696 ms
Jul 25, 202697 ms
Aug 1, 202697 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202689 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202685 ms
Sep 5, 202689 ms
Sep 12, 202693 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202692 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of technibilt.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. technibilt.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. technibilt.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. technibilt.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. technibilt.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. technibilt.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. technibilt.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. technibilt.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. technibilt.com at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

7 to fix62
  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 86). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 900 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 337 KiB

    About 337 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    700 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 700 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    526 KiB

    About 526 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 205 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (205 KiB).

  • 2,227 HTML elements

    The page has 2,227 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 368 KiB and 228 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    103 KiB

    3 images could be 103 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 91 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 455 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 119 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Your largest element takes 4.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.296

    0.296

    The layout shifts by 0.296 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 92 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 91 ms

    91 ms

    Real visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 51 ms

    51 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 51 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.48 g of CO₂e: 57.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.7 MB in 22 requests

    1.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 22 requests on a phone: scripts 862 KiB (11), stylesheets 518 KiB (3) and images 250 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8391
  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10078
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (177 characters)

    Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 119 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 119 pages on technibilt.com and 5 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Leading international partner in global retail | Wanzl”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wanzl.com/en_US.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wanzl.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (743 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 11 pages share a title

    /en_US/products, /en_US/products/baskets~c407, /en_US/products/baskets/shopping-baskets~c431, /en_US/products/baskets/special-offer-baskets~c430, /en_US/products/baskets/various-baskets~c3413 and /en_US/products/carts~c375 and 5 others all use the title “Products | Wanzl”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages share a meta description

    /en_US/products, /en_US/products/baskets~c407, /en_US/products/baskets/shopping-baskets~c431, /en_US/products/baskets/special-offer-baskets~c430, /en_US/products/baskets/various-baskets~c3413 and /en_US/products/carts~c375 and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    /en_US/business%20units/material-handling, /en_US/business%20units/airport, /en_US/business%20units/access and /en_US/products have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 90 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 44 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix72
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • A 15-field form

    Your longest form asks for 15 fields (11 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 415 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 415 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Order picking carts”, “Find a contact person” and “Contact form”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at technibilt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on technibilt.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25