Website review, no card needed

tediber.com logo

tediber.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202645 issues · 92 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on tediber.com, 14 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.1 sApr 25Oct 102.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.2 s
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
252 ms176 msApr 25Oct 10243 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026188 ms
May 2, 2026190 ms
May 9, 2026189 ms
May 16, 2026187 ms
May 23, 2026185 ms
May 30, 2026188 ms
Jun 6, 2026188 ms
Jun 13, 2026192 ms
Jun 20, 2026196 ms
Jun 27, 2026201 ms
Jul 4, 2026205 ms
Jul 11, 2026206 ms
Jul 18, 2026204 ms
Jul 25, 2026196 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026187 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026186 ms
Aug 29, 2026186 ms
Sep 5, 2026188 ms
Sep 12, 2026195 ms
Sep 19, 2026204 ms
Sep 26, 2026221 ms
Oct 3, 2026236 ms
Oct 10, 2026243 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tediber.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tediber.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. tediber.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. tediber.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. tediber.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. tediber.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. tediber.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. tediber.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. tediber.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

9 to fix53
  • 6,528 HTML elements

    The page has 6,528 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 5.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Trust Pilot, ContentSquare and Kameleoon and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 811 KiB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (811 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    494 KiB

    About 494 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Trust Pilot adds 261 ms

    261 ms

    Trust Pilot costs a phone 261 ms of main-thread work and 551 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Klaviyo adds 135 ms

    135 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 504 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 137 KiB

    3 images could be 137 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 207 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 38 KiB

    About 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

13 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.2 s

    25.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Your largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Jusqu'à -40%*”.

  • Speed Index: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 280 ms

    280 ms

    Real visitors wait 280 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.11

    0.11

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 243 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.192

    0.192

    The layout shifts by 0.192 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 154 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 4.2 MB in 382 requests

    4.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 382 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (139), other files 826 KiB (132) and images 526 KiB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    trustpilot_mention_hero.svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.19 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 142.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 9491
  • 30 tap targets too small

    30 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Summary elements must have discernible text (1 element)

    Summary elements must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 78 links without text

    78 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (8 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 107 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 58 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 65 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 58 passed and 7 failed. 8 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Tediber | Marque française spécialiste literie” and “Jusqu'à -40%*”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (164 characters)

    Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 253 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 253 pages on tediber.com and 22 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Tediber | Marque française spécialiste literie”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tediber.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tediber.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,677 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.tediber.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tediber.com/pages/avis-clients, https://www.tediber.com/collections/all and https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.tediber.com/pages/avis-clients, https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.tediber.com/collections/sommier and https://www.tediber.com/collections/linge-de-lit have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.tediber.com/collections/sommier has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 186 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=5117670&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=61252e40-4e85-4fe6-9d15-0583a7513c38&bo=3&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Tediber%20%7C%20Marque%20fran%C3%A7aise%20sp%C.

  • 36 small tap targets

    36 of 116 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,160 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,160 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Aide et contact”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 39 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tediber.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Company

Founded
2015
Headquarters
Paris

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on tediber.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25