Website review, no card needed
tediber.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202645 issues · 92 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on tediber.com, 14 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66D- #88,026 of 96,092 reviewed websitesbeats 7%
- #49,680 of 51,980 online storesbeats 4%
- #45,386 of 47,076 Shopify storesbeats 3%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 190 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 185 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 243 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.5 s
Speed
6,528 HTML elements
The page has 6,528 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Trust Pilot, ContentSquare and Kameleoon and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 811 KiB38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (811 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
494 KiBAbout 494 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Trust Pilot adds 261 ms
261 msTrust Pilot costs a phone 261 ms of main-thread work and 551 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Klaviyo adds 135 ms
135 msKlaviyo costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 504 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 137 KiB3 images could be 137 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 207 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 25.2 s
25.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sYour largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Jusqu'à -40%*”.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 280 ms
280 msReal visitors wait 280 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 243 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.192
0.192The layout shifts by 0.192 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 154 ms
154 msScripts block the page for only 154 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 382 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 382 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (139), other files 826 KiB (132) and images 526 KiB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
trustpilot_mention_hero.svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 142.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
30 tap targets too small
30 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
18 text elements with low contrast
18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Summary elements must have discernible text (1 element)
Summary elements must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
78 links without text
78 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (8 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 107 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
58 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 65 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 58 passed and 7 failed. 8 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Tediber | Marque française spécialiste literie” and “Jusqu'à -40%*”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (164 characters)
Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
253 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 253 pages on tediber.com and 22 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Tediber | Marque française spécialiste literie”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tediber.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tediber.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,677 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.tediber.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.tediber.com/pages/avis-clients, https://www.tediber.com/collections/all and https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.tediber.com/pages/avis-clients, https://www.tediber.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.tediber.com/collections/sommier and https://www.tediber.com/collections/linge-de-lit have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.tediber.com/collections/sommier has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 186 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=5117670&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=61252e40-4e85-4fe6-9d15-0583a7513c38&bo=3&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Tediber%20%7C%20Marque%20fran%C3%A7aise%20sp%C.
36 small tap targets
36 of 116 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,160 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,160 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Aide et contact”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tediber.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Company
- Founded
- 2015
- Headquarters
- Paris
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on tediber.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.