Website review, no card needed
tekrevol.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202617 issues · 79 checks
This review found 17 issues worth fixing on tekrevol.com, 3 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: hidden but focusable. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
93AClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 172 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 181 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
622 KiB4 images could be 622 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
1,507 HTML elements
The page has 1,507 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
110 ms · 68 KiBAbout 68 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 110 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
149 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (149 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
100 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare and Digital Millennium Copyright Act Services), adding 16 KiB and 6 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 100
100/100Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.2 s
A phone's processor spends 0.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 24 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 164 ms to 181 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
11 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 45% faster for real visitors
-45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sYour largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Human Vision. Intelligent Technology. Exceptional Products.”.
Speed Index: 1.1 s
1.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 1.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe page is fully interactive after 1.1 s.
Images and page weight
1 image in older formats
1 image (86 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.51 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.51 g of CO₂e: 61.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 1.8 MB in 43 requests
1.8 MBYour homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 43 requests on a phone: images 1.4 MB (29), fonts 259 KiB (5) and stylesheets 81 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (9 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 106 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 2 problems, for example “Organization: missing @context (expected "https://schema.org")”.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
152 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 152 pages on tekrevol.com and 14 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “TekRevol, a digital transformation company, leverages novel tech & innovation to create value and shared success for cl…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Human Vision. Intelligent Technology. Exceptional Products.”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Digital Transformation Company | TekRevol”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tekrevol.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tekrevol.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,775 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.tekrevol.com/llms.txt (11 KiB, 46 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.tekrevol.com/solution/erp-developers, whose canonical is https://www.tekrevol.com/erp-software-development. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 95 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,236 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,236 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Get A Quote”, “Contact Us” and “Download”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 27 testimonial or review blocks, 36 customer or partner logos, a star rating, 12 trust badges and “20,000+ users”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 7 phone links and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tekrevol.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 17 issues on tekrevol.com, including 3 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.