Website review, no card needed

tekscan.com logo

tekscan.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202638 issues · 87 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on tekscan.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 19.1 MB in 97 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s2.0 sMay 2Oct 172.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
178 ms103 msMay 2Oct 17129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026123 ms
May 9, 2026122 ms
May 16, 2026120 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026155 ms
Jun 20, 2026163 ms
Jun 27, 2026165 ms
Jul 4, 2026169 ms
Jul 11, 2026148 ms
Jul 18, 2026146 ms
Jul 25, 2026139 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026122 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026122 ms
Sep 19, 2026123 ms
Sep 26, 2026122 ms
Oct 3, 2026125 ms
Oct 10, 2026123 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tekscan.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tekscan.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tekscan.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tekscan.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. tekscan.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. tekscan.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. tekscan.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. tekscan.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. tekscan.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix37
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 352 KiB

    About 352 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 97). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    17.6 MB

    7 images could be 17.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 935 KiB and 861 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    700 ms · 155 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (155 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 568 ms

    568 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 568 ms of main-thread work and 677 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 212 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    65 KiB

    About 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 97 but mobile only 37. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Your largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Tekscan Pressure Mapping Technology”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.783

    0.783

    The layout shifts by 0.783 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.4 s

    14.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 859 ms

    859 ms

    Real visitors wait 859 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 192 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 19.1 MB in 97 requests

    19.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.1 MB in 97 requests on a phone: images 17.9 MB (32), scripts 988 KiB (26) and fonts 95 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    1.3 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Tekscan-IScan-System-software-hires.png at 1,818 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (2.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    hero-bg_0.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (758 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.40 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.40 g of CO₂e: 648.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8994
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8580
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Home” and “Impactful Insightsfrom Surface Sensing”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (220 characters)

    Your meta description is 220 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 180 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 180 pages on tekscan.com and 4 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Pressure Mapping, Force Measurement, & Tactile Sensors | Tekscan”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tekscan.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tekscan.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tekscan.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (896 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tekscan.com/products-solutions/pressure-mapping-technology and https://www.tekscan.com/industry/biomechanics have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 720 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 720 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Buy Products Online”, “Contact Us” and “Learn more →”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tekscan.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on tekscan.com, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25