Website review, no card needed

telemundo.com logo

telemundo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202655 issues · 98 checks

This review found 55 issues worth fixing on telemundo.com, 24 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 312.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
243 ms146 msMay 16Oct 31232 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026157 ms
May 23, 2026161 ms
May 30, 2026161 ms
Jun 6, 2026162 ms
Jun 13, 2026169 ms
Jun 20, 2026177 ms
Jun 27, 2026187 ms
Jul 4, 2026196 ms
Jul 11, 2026215 ms
Jul 18, 2026217 ms
Jul 25, 2026220 ms
Aug 1, 2026220 ms
Aug 8, 2026221 ms
Aug 15, 2026219 ms
Aug 22, 2026214 ms
Aug 29, 2026215 ms
Sep 5, 2026220 ms
Sep 12, 2026227 ms
Sep 19, 2026227 ms
Sep 26, 2026226 ms
Oct 3, 2026228 ms
Oct 10, 2026230 ms
Oct 17, 2026231 ms
Oct 24, 2026232 ms
Oct 31, 2026232 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of telemundo.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. telemundo.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. telemundo.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  3. telemundo.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  4. telemundo.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  5. telemundo.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  6. telemundo.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  7. telemundo.com at 9.1 s9.1 s
  8. telemundo.com at 10.4 s10.4 s

Speed

15 to fix34
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.9 s · 2.3 MB

    About 2.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.3 s · 1.1 MB

    85 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • nbcnews.com adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    nbcnews.com costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Taboola adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Taboola costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 10.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,464 HTML elements

    The page has 3,464 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (nbcnews.com, Taboola and DoubleVerify and others), adding 6.2 MB and 3.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    940 ms · 218 KiB

    About 218 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 940 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    400 ms · 118 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 118 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    310 ms · 44 KiB

    44 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 328 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 201 ms

    201 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 201 ms of main-thread work and 460 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Adobe Tag Manager adds 144 ms

    144 ms

    Adobe Tag Manager costs a phone 144 ms of main-thread work and 314 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 68 KiB

    5 images could be 68 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 61 ms

    61 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 61 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.5 s

    26.5 s

    Your largest element takes 26.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Speed Index: 23.0 s

    23.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 23.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 61.0 s

    61.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 61.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 232 ms

    232 ms

    Real visitors wait 232 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 46% slower for real visitors

    +46%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 232 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 42 images without width and height

    42 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 574 ms

    574 ms

    Real visitors wait 574 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 10.3 MB in 675 requests

    10.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.3 MB in 675 requests on a phone: scripts 5.8 MB (223), images 3.1 MB (149) and other files 580 KiB (241). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.93 g of CO₂e: 351.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7985
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 37 tap targets too small

    37 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (129 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 129 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 47 links without text

    47 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings should not be empty (6 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 98 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 13 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (74 characters)

    Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Telemundo | Noticias, Shows, Entretenimiento, Series y Novelas | Telemundo”.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 333 internal links, 59 external

    The homepage links to 333 pages on telemundo.com and 59 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “La mejor cobertura de noticias en español, capítulos completos de nuestras series y shows, entretenimiento, estilo de v…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.telemundo.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: CollectionPage, Dataset and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.telemundo.com/sitemap/telemundo/sitemap-index.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.telemundo.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,058 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.telemundo.com/ayuda is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.telemundo.com/ayuda has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.telemundo.com/shows, https://www.telemundo.com/noticias, https://www.telemundo.com/entretenimiento and https://www.telemundo.com/telemundo-al-dia have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.telemundo.com/telemundo-al-dia and https://www.telemundo.com/estaciones took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 115 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 45 small tap targets

    45 of 97 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 11 third-party cookies

    11 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,060 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,060 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Amplitude, Comscore, Criteo and Google Ads and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 35 cookies set on arrival

    35

    Opening the homepage sets 35 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 72 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 72 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at telemundo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 55 issues on telemundo.com, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25