Website review, no card needed
telephonics.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202633 issues · 82 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on telephonics.com, 19 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 93 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
104.5 s · 21.7 MB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (21.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
84.7 s · 17.8 MB11 images could be 17.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 84.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.0 s · 827 KiBAbout 827 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.3 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.7 s · 542 KiBAbout 542 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 53). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify JavaScript
750 ms · 143 KiB143 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
FontAwesome CDN adds 65 ms
65 msFontAwesome CDN costs a phone 65 ms of main-thread work and 422 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 68 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 68 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (FontAwesome CDN, Plausible and Google Fonts), adding 468 KiB and 70 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 97 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
64 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 218 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 70 ms
70 msYour server sent the HTML in 70 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.39
0.39For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.39 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 106.9 s
106.9 sYour largest element takes 106.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 20.1 s
20.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 106.9 s
106.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 106.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe first text or image appears after 5.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 96 ms
96 msReal visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 63 ms
63 msScripts block the page for only 63 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.3 MB in 52 requests
22.3 MBYour homepage downloads 22.3 MB in 52 requests on a phone: images 20.0 MB (34), scripts 1.6 MB (9) and stylesheets 600 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (188 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 6.3 g of CO₂ per visit
6.32 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.32 g of CO₂e: 758.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Links must have discernible text (8 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.ttm.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
223 internal links, 85 external
The homepage links to 223 pages on telephonics.com and 85 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 120 characters
Your meta description is 120 characters: “TTM Technologies is an advanced Printed Circuit Board (PCB) manufacturer and a leading supplier in technology solutions.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Latest Updates”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Advanced PCB Manufacturer & RF Supplier | TTM Technologies”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is http://www.ttm.com/en.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ttm.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (852 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.ttm.com/en/about-ttm/latest-updates and https://www.ttm.com/en/about-ttm/global-locations have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.ttm.com/en/about-ttm/who-we-are/life-at-ttm, https://www.ttm.com/en/about-ttm/corporate-structure, https://www.ttm.com/en/about-ttm/latest-updates and https://www.ttm.com/en/about-ttm/achievements took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
23 small tap targets
23 of 41 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 low-resolution images
3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 402 words of copy
The homepage carries about 402 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Join TTM North America”, “Join TTM Asia Pacific” and “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Plausible.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at telephonics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on telephonics.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.