Website review, no card needed

tempsens.com logo

tempsens.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202641 issues · 81 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on tempsens.com, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.8 s2.8 sMay 9Oct 243.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.5 s
May 16, 20264.5 s
May 23, 20264.5 s
May 30, 20264.4 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms98 msMay 9Oct 24114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026116 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026118 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026115 ms
Jun 13, 2026116 ms
Jun 20, 2026116 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026112 ms
Aug 1, 2026109 ms
Aug 8, 2026110 ms
Aug 15, 2026106 ms
Aug 22, 2026101 ms
Aug 29, 2026101 ms
Sep 5, 2026101 ms
Sep 12, 2026101 ms
Sep 19, 2026102 ms
Sep 26, 2026106 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tempsens.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tempsens.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. tempsens.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. tempsens.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. tempsens.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. tempsens.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. tempsens.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. tempsens.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. tempsens.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

11 to fix30
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 330 KiB

    About 330 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 2.2 MB

    4 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 830 KiB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 975 ms

    975 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 975 ms of main-thread work and 697 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    723 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 723 ms on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    700 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 700 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 327 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 823 ms

    823 ms

    Your server takes 823 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (24 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    78 KiB

    About 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    Your largest element takes 12.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Site Banner”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.335

    0.335

    The layout shifts by 0.335 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 811 ms

    811 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 811 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 12.3 MB in 99 requests

    12.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 99 requests on a phone: images 11.1 MB (30), scripts 1.0 MB (35) and HTML 113 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    157 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example calibrator.webp at 1,377 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 157 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (58 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.49 g of CO₂e: 419.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 73 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9283
  • Title is long (74 characters)

    Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Thermal Engineering Solutions And Specialised Cables Manufacturer Tempsens”.

  • Meta description is long (201 characters)

    Your meta description is 201 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 239 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 239 pages on tempsens.com and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Tempsens - Thermal Engineering Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tempsens.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tempsens.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,423 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (195 KiB, 263 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    /ct/temperature-sensing-solutions/level-gauges-switches and /ct/temperature-sensing-solutions/diaphragm-seal have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /key-person, whose canonical is /investors/key-person. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /about-us, /board-of-directors, /key-person, /csr, /award-and-accreditation and /ct/temperature-sensing-solutions and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    /about-us, /key-person and /csr took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 112 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'export'”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 15-field form

    Your longest form asks for 15 fields (3 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 556 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 556 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us ▾”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Contact Investor Grievance ▾” and “Contact Us ▾”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tempsens.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Founded
1990
Headquarters
Udaipur

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on tempsens.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25