Website review, no card needed

tergan.com.tr logo

tergan.com.tr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202648 issues · 95 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on tergan.com.tr, 25 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.3 sMay 2Oct 171.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
244 ms189 msMay 2Oct 17221 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026238 ms
May 9, 2026235 ms
May 16, 2026226 ms
May 23, 2026211 ms
May 30, 2026200 ms
Jun 6, 2026195 ms
Jun 13, 2026198 ms
Jun 20, 2026209 ms
Jun 27, 2026210 ms
Jul 4, 2026210 ms
Jul 11, 2026210 ms
Jul 18, 2026206 ms
Jul 25, 2026202 ms
Aug 1, 2026200 ms
Aug 8, 2026200 ms
Aug 15, 2026197 ms
Aug 22, 2026199 ms
Aug 29, 2026201 ms
Sep 5, 2026199 ms
Sep 12, 2026204 ms
Sep 19, 2026205 ms
Sep 26, 2026206 ms
Oct 3, 2026213 ms
Oct 10, 2026216 ms
Oct 17, 2026221 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tergan.com.tr (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tergan.com.tr at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. tergan.com.tr at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. tergan.com.tr at 3.6 s3.6 s
  4. tergan.com.tr at 4.8 s4.8 s
  5. tergan.com.tr at 5.9 s5.9 s
  6. tergan.com.tr at 7.1 s7.1 s
  7. tergan.com.tr at 8.3 s8.3 s
  8. tergan.com.tr at 9.5 s9.5 s

Speed

12 to fix16
  • Improve image delivery

    11.5 s · 3.6 MB

    9 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.3 s · 621 KiB

    About 621 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 601 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (601 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 16

    16/100

    Your mobile performance score is 16 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Insider and Facebook and others), adding 2.2 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 961 ms

    961 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 961 ms of main-thread work and 672 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Insider adds 561 ms

    561 ms

    Insider costs a phone 561 ms of main-thread work and 539 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 499 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • 1,858 HTML elements

    The page has 1,858 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • streamable.com adds 51 ms

    51 ms

    streamable.com costs a phone 51 ms of main-thread work and 641 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 201 KiB

    About 201 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 52 but mobile only 16. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 136 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 31.6 s

    31.6 s

    Your largest element takes 31.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Kadın Ayakkabı”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.8 s

    31.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.66

    0.66

    The layout shifts by 0.66 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 238 ms to 221 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 173 ms

    173 ms

    Real visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 767 ms

    767 ms

    Real visitors wait 767 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 6.7 MB in 134 requests

    6.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.7 MB in 134 requests on a phone: images 4.2 MB (30), scripts 1.6 MB (27) and media 556 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    1.6 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example adgrey-logo_2.png at 5,077 px wide, shown at 30 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.

  • 20 images in older formats

    20 images (5.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (994 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.90 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.90 g of CO₂e: 228.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

15 to fixGoogle 6280
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (11 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (11 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 15 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is long (72 characters)

    Your title is 72 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “TERGAN | Hakiki Deri, Ayakkabı, Çanta, Cüzdan, Aksesuar, Fırsat Ürünleri”.

  • Meta description is long (287 characters)

    Your meta description is 287 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 401 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 401 pages on tergan.com.tr and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “TERGAN: Ayakkabı, Çanta Modelleri ve Deri Ürünler”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tergan.com.tr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tergan.com.tr/xml/sitemap/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,963 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.tergan.com.tr/llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 152 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 19 small tap targets

    19 of 64 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error while parsing the 'sandbox' attribute: 'allow-autoplay' is an invalid sandbox flag.”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,388 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,388 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tergan.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on tergan.com.tr, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25