Website review, no card needed
terza.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202653 issues · 91 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on terza.com, 24 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 196 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.9 s
3.8 s
5.7 s
7.6 s
9.5 s
11.3 s
13.2 s
15.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 19.3 MB97 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19.3 MB).
Reduce initial server response time
2.6 sReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 2.6 s on a phone.
Document request latency
2.6 sThe HTML itself could arrive about 2.6 s sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 745 KiBAbout 745 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Server response: 2.7 s
2.7 sYour server takes 2.7 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 4.4 MB16 images could be 4.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 697 ms
697 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 697 ms of main-thread work and 865 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 32 KiBAbout 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Maps adds 236 ms
236 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 475 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 270 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 30.1 s
30.1 sYour largest element takes 30.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 35.6 s
35.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.4 s
14.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 286 ms
286 msReal visitors wait 286 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 88% slower for real visitors
+88%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 427 ms
427 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 427 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
29 images without width and height
29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
11 images over 500 KB
11 images weigh 34.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
Page weight: 20.8 MB in 144 requests
20.8 MBYour homepage downloads 20.8 MB in 144 requests on a phone: images 18.6 MB (79), scripts 1.7 MB (35) and fonts 419 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
888 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 5T697_97518_Feature1.webp at 2,240 px wide, shown at 320 px. Resized copies would save about 888 KiB.
16 images in older formats
16 images (29.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (5.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.9 g of CO₂ per visit
5.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.90 g of CO₂e: 708.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
4 dropdowns have no label.
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
autocomplete attribute must be used correctly (4 elements)
autocomplete attribute must be used correctly: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Form elements should have a visible label (2 elements)
Form elements should have a visible label: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 63 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
43 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 43 pages on terza.com and 4 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pisosde madera”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Fabricante #1 en Pasto Sintético y Alfombras de México | Terza”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.terza.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: LocalBusiness.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.terza.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.terza.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (673 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.terza.com/distribuidor and https://www.terza.com/catalogos have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.terza.com/decorador-virtual/roomvo and https://www.terza.com/catalogos have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.terza.com/decorador-virtual/roomvo has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 42 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
A 11-field form
Your longest form asks for 11 fields (9 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 772 words of copy
The homepage carries about 772 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 3 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 11 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at terza.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2024.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Imperva
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on terza.com, including 28 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.