Website review, no card needed

tesmart.com logo

tesmart.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202633 issues · 81 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on tesmart.com, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
218 ms89 msMay 16Oct 31112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026105 ms
May 23, 2026126 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026168 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026186 ms
Jul 4, 2026195 ms
Jul 11, 2026199 ms
Jul 18, 2026203 ms
Jul 25, 2026185 ms
Aug 1, 2026162 ms
Aug 8, 2026157 ms
Aug 15, 2026161 ms
Aug 22, 2026171 ms
Aug 29, 2026185 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026161 ms
Sep 19, 2026137 ms
Sep 26, 2026109 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 2026108 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms
Oct 31, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tesmart.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tesmart.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. tesmart.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  3. tesmart.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  4. tesmart.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  5. tesmart.com at 7.6 s7.6 s
  6. tesmart.com at 9.1 s9.1 s
  7. tesmart.com at 10.6 s10.6 s
  8. tesmart.com at 12.1 s12.1 s

Speed

10 to fix70
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Main-thread work: 9.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,221 HTML elements

    The page has 3,221 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, ZenDesk and vitals.app and others), adding 2.6 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    966 KiB

    About 966 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    502 KiB

    25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (502 KiB).

  • Shopify adds 289 ms

    289 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 289 ms of main-thread work and 996 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 227 ms

    227 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 227 ms of main-thread work and 431 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • vitals.app adds 168 ms

    168 ms

    vitals.app costs a phone 168 ms of main-thread work and 320 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    280 ms · 77 KiB

    About 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 280 ms faster on a phone.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 128 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    73 KiB

    2 images could be 73 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 24.7 s

    24.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Your largest element takes 4.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 349 ms

    349 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 349 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 702 ms

    702 ms

    Real visitors wait 702 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 4.8 MB in 535 requests

    4.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 535 requests on a phone: scripts 2.6 MB (242), other files 1.1 MB (223) and images 558 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    8K_1080x1326_09d72ef7-7246-4a58-ab94-2e601d199257.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.37 g of CO₂e: 163.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9794
  • Hidden but focusable

    8 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 31 links without text

    31 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 54 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10084
  • Title is long (77 characters)

    Your title is 77 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pro KVM Switch: 8K60/4K144 with EDID | 5-Yr Warranty + 50% Trade-in – TESmart”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (246 characters)

    Your meta description is 246 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 84 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 84 pages on tesmart.com and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “TESmart”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tesmart.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tesmart.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,108 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.tesmart.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 521 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tesmart.com/policies/shipping-policy and https://www.tesmart.com/collections/all have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 11 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.tesmart.com/collections/best-sellers, whose canonical is https://www.tesmart.com/a/shop/collections/best-sellers. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.tesmart.com/collections/8k-kvm-gaming-dock, https://www.tesmart.com/collections/refurbished and https://www.tesmart.com/collections/sales have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    https://www.tesmart.com/collections/hdmi-matrix, https://www.tesmart.com/collections/hdmi-switch, https://www.tesmart.com/collections/accessories, https://www.tesmart.com/collections/usb4-ssd-enclosures, https://www.tesmart.com/pages/tesmart-id and https://www.tesmart.com/collections/all and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    34 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • About 351 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 351 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Order note”, “Apply” and “Shop”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 25 cookies set on arrival

    25

    Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 47 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tesmart.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 14 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Geo Pro Geolocation · Inbox · Uppromote Affiliate · Vitals · Easylocation · Affliate By Secomapp · Tek Labs Gifts Upsell · Snapcoupon · Countdown Timer · Cwilltrustoo Reviews · automizely.com · shareasale.com · vstar.app · attribuly.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on tesmart.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25