Website review, no card needed

tessi.fr logo

tessi.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202636 issues · 83 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on tessi.fr, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.9 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
126 ms107 msMay 16Oct 31111 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026110 ms
May 30, 2026111 ms
Jun 6, 2026109 ms
Jun 13, 2026114 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026110 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026113 ms
Jul 18, 2026115 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026121 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026120 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026124 ms
Sep 19, 2026123 ms
Sep 26, 2026123 ms
Oct 3, 2026118 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms
Oct 17, 2026109 ms
Oct 24, 2026109 ms
Oct 31, 2026111 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tessi.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tessi.fr at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. tessi.fr at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. tessi.fr at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. tessi.fr at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. tessi.fr at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. tessi.fr at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. tessi.fr at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. tessi.fr at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

5 to fix88
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 748 KiB

    52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (748 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 88

    88/100

    Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 105 KiB

    About 105 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,508 HTML elements

    The page has 1,508 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    170 KiB

    About 170 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, axept.io and Google Fonts and others), adding 203 KiB and 112 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 86 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 347 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 94 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Informations à la une”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 31 ms

    31 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 31 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.37 g of CO₂e: 44.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 58 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 58 requests on a phone: media 664 KiB (1), scripts 407 KiB (28) and stylesheets 127 KiB (14). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 7685
  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9283
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Structured data has 3 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 3 problems, for example “ld+json block 2 is not valid JSON (Bad control character in string literal in JSON at position )”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 186 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 186 pages on tessi.fr and 2 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “BPO spécialiste, dans un monde agentique”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Tessi - BPO spécialiste, dans un monde agentique”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tessi.eu/fr/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tessi.eu/fr/sitemap_index.xml/.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tessi.eu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,426 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/facturation-electronique-processus-procure-to-pay and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/factures-clients-procure-to-pay-order-to-cash all use the title “Facture électronique : Plateforme Agréée DIGITAL INVOICE by Tessi”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tessi.eu/fr/decouvrir-tessi and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/decouvrir-tessi/decouvrez-lespace-presse have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/facturation-electronique-processus-procure-to-pay and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/factures-clients-procure-to-pay-order-to-cash use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/document/editique-flux-sortants-marketing-direct, whose canonical is https://www.tessi.eu/fr/digital-experience-by-tessi. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/document/editique-flux-sortants-marketing-direct and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/facturation-electronique-processus-procure-to-pay took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 148 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “wp is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 475 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 475 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tessi.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Inherent

Company

Founded
1971
Headquarters
Grenoble

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on tessi.fr, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25