Website review, no card needed
tessi.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202636 issues · 83 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on tessi.fr, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 111 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 748 KiB52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (748 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 88
88/100Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 105 KiBAbout 105 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
1,508 HTML elements
The page has 1,508 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Reduce unused JavaScript
170 KiBAbout 170 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, axept.io and Google Fonts and others), adding 203 KiB and 112 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 86 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 347 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 94 ms
94 msYour server sent the HTML in 94 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.9 s
7.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 87 ms
87 msReal visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sYour largest element renders in 2.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Informations à la une”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 31 ms
31 msScripts block the page for only 31 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.37 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.37 g of CO₂e: 44.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.3 MB in 58 requests
1.3 MBYour homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 58 requests on a phone: media 664 KiB (1), scripts 407 KiB (28) and stylesheets 127 KiB (14). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
7 buttons without a name
7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Positive tabindex
1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 form fields without a label
8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Structured data has 3 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 3 problems, for example “ld+json block 2 is not valid JSON (Bad control character in string literal in JSON at position )”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
186 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 186 pages on tessi.fr and 2 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “BPO spécialiste, dans un monde agentique”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Tessi - BPO spécialiste, dans un monde agentique”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tessi.eu/fr/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tessi.eu/fr/sitemap_index.xml/.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tessi.eu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,426 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/facturation-electronique-processus-procure-to-pay and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/factures-clients-procure-to-pay-order-to-cash all use the title “Facture électronique : Plateforme Agréée DIGITAL INVOICE by Tessi”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.tessi.eu/fr/decouvrir-tessi and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/decouvrir-tessi/decouvrez-lespace-presse have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/facturation-electronique-processus-procure-to-pay and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/factures-clients-procure-to-pay-order-to-cash use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/document/editique-flux-sortants-marketing-direct, whose canonical is https://www.tessi.eu/fr/digital-experience-by-tessi. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/document/editique-flux-sortants-marketing-direct and https://www.tessi.eu/fr/solution/services/digitalisation-des-processus-documentaires/facture-et-paiement/facturation-electronique-processus-procure-to-pay took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 148 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “wp is not defined”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 475 words of copy
The homepage carries about 475 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tessi.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Inherent
Company
- Founded
- 1971
- Headquarters
- Grenoble
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on tessi.fr, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.