Website review, no card needed

tex-mex.com logo

tex-mex.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202635 issues · 85 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on tex-mex.com, 13 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
87 ms84 msMay 9Oct 2485 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202686 ms
May 30, 202686 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202686 ms
Jun 20, 202686 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202687 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202686 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202684 ms
Oct 24, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tex-mex.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tex-mex.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. tex-mex.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. tex-mex.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. tex-mex.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. tex-mex.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. tex-mex.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. tex-mex.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. tex-mex.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

14 to fix22
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.0 s · 842 KiB

    About 842 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 339 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (339 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 663 KiB

    11 images could be 663 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 22

    22/100

    Your mobile performance score is 22. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google Maps and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 474 ms

    474 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 474 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    410 ms · 55 KiB

    About 55 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 410 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 417 ms

    417 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 417 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 36 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 266 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Maps adds 205 ms

    205 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 205 ms of main-thread work and 408 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 1 ms

    1 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 1 ms of main-thread work and 387 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.3 s

    23.3 s

    Your largest element takes 23.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Tex Mex Catering Events PARTY PACKS, PRIVATE DINING, CATERI…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.7 s

    23.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.484

    0.484

    The layout shifts by 0.484 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 939 ms

    939 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 939 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 82 ms

    82 ms

    Real visitors wait 82 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 491 ms

    491 ms

    Real visitors wait 491 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 119 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 119 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (33), scripts 1.8 MB (33) and fonts 659 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Redfish-Tejas-26_Webslider_Mobile2-768x545.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.52 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.52 g of CO₂e: 183.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9797
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “Lupe Tortilla - Lupe Tortilla”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 93 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 93 pages on tex-mex.com and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 114 characters

    Your meta description is 114 characters: “Earn one point for every dollar you spend. You will also be updated on special events and reward program benefits.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Find your Nearest Lupe Tortilla”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tex-mex.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Restaurant, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tex-mex.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages share a title

    /locations, /location-by-region and /location-listing all use the title “Tex-Mex Restaurant Locations | Lupe Tortilla”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    /locations, /location-by-region and /location-listing use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix78
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Only about 72 words

    The homepage has only about 72 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Order Online”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Order Online”, “Join the Waitlist” and “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tex-mex.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on tex-mex.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25