Website review, no card needed
thatpetplace.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202661 issues · 101 checks
This review found 61 issues worth fixing on thatpetplace.com, 26 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
54FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 176 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 174 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 213 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.9 s
3.5 s
4.1 s
4.7 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
13.5 s · 2.5 MB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
4.7 s · 1.1 MB7 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.2 s · 992 KiBAbout 992 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 15
15/100Your mobile performance score is 15 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 144 KiBAbout 144 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
600 ms · 50 KiB50 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 396 ms
396 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 396 ms of main-thread work and 372 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 62 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 260 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google CDN adds 197 ms
197 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 197 ms of main-thread work and 294 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 46 but mobile only 15. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 1.26
1.26For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.26 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 11.2 s
11.2 sThe first text or image appears after 11.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.7 s
22.7 sYour largest element takes 22.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “VISIT OUR”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.148
1.148The layout shifts by 1.148 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 22.8 s
22.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.2 s
11.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 627 ms
627 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 627 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 238 ms
238 msReal visitors wait 238 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 213 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user TTFB: 633 ms
633 msReal visitors wait 633 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 109 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 109 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (22), scripts 2.1 MB (52) and stylesheets 150 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
1.5 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example media.nl at 2,400 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (2.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.34 g of CO₂e: 160.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
46 text elements with low contrast
46 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (2 elements).
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (3 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 16 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pet Supplies and Fish Supplies at That Fish Place - That Pet Place”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.thatpetplace.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
209 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 209 pages on thatpetplace.com and 8 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 97 characters
Your meta description is 97 characters: “Discount Pet Supplies & Fish Supplies up to 60% off every day at That Fish Place - That Pet Place”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.thatpetplace.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.thatpetplace.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (884 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.thatpetplace.com/aquarium-supplies/aquarium-stands and https://www.thatpetplace.com/aquarium-supplies/cleaning-maintenance-supplies have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 small tap targets
10 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “require is not defined”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 406 words of copy
The homepage carries about 406 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Contact Us”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More!”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thatpetplace.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 61 issues on thatpetplace.com, including 26 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.