Website review, no card needed
thecollective.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202642 issues · 81 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on thecollective.in, 15 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 245 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.5 s
3.0 s
4.4 s
5.9 s
7.4 s
8.9 s
10.3 s
11.8 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.3 s · 1.1 MB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 684 KiBAbout 684 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.4 s
A phone's processor spends 7.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Adobe Tag Manager, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
893 KiB3 images could be 893 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Adobe Tag Manager adds 793 ms
793 msAdobe Tag Manager costs a phone 793 ms of main-thread work and 142 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 395 ms
395 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 395 ms of main-thread work and 491 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 350 ms
350 msFacebook costs a phone 350 ms of main-thread work and 279 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 48 KiBAbout 48 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 340 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 29 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s
11.7 sYour largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail Limited uses cookies to enhan…”. Most of its time is element render delay (7.6 s).
Speed Index: 17.0 s
17.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 22.8 s
22.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 209 ms
209 msReal visitors wait 209 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 196 ms to 245 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.073
0.073The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.073, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 161 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 161 requests on a phone: media 3.6 MB (2), scripts 1.9 MB (63) and images 1.2 MB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
175 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example home_page_Home_Banner_Carousel_17894570511930.jpg at 1,630 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 175 KiB.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.96 g of CO₂e: 235.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (7 elements).
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
Title is long (86 characters)
Your title is 86 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “The Collective - Buy Luxury Designer Clothing & Accessories for Men and Women in India”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (172 characters)
Your meta description is 172 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
193 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 193 pages on thecollective.in and 0 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Home”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.thecollective.in/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.thecollective.in/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.thecollective.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, https://www.thecollective.in/store-locator and https://www.thecollective.in/checkoutsummary all use the title “The Collective - Buy Luxury Designer Clothing & Accessories for Men a…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.thecollective.in/store-locator and https://www.thecollective.in/checkoutsummary use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.thecollective.in/c/prl-polobearshop, https://www.thecollective.in/c/newarrival, https://www.thecollective.in/c/new-arrivals-all, https://www.thecollective.in/c/men-new-arrivals, https://www.thecollective.in/c/women-new-arrivals and https://www.thecollective.in/c/new-arrivals-new-in have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.thecollective.in/checkoutsummary has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 182 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=56262032&Ver=2&mid=415a9e95-814a-4133-b9a6-b3e89e60757f&bo=1&sid=78492110cb9311f19d28073758d7928f&vid=78492d40cb9311f195ba69603a70b4e5&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
4 third-party cookies
4 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the font 'https://consent.trustarc.com/v2/asset/cyrillic-ext.woff2' violates the following Content Security Pol…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 73 words
The homepage has only about 73 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW”.
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “polo bear shop”.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
34 cookies set on arrival
34Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: TrustArc
A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thecollective.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on thecollective.in, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.