Programmable

Website review, no card needed

thecoolector.com logo

thecoolector.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202618 issues · 64 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on thecoolector.com, 3 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

88B

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
71 ms62 msMay 16Oct 3163 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202663 ms
May 23, 202665 ms
May 30, 202664 ms
Jun 6, 202669 ms
Jun 13, 202669 ms
Jun 20, 202664 ms
Jun 27, 202670 ms
Jul 4, 202667 ms
Jul 11, 202666 ms
Jul 18, 202666 ms
Jul 25, 202664 ms
Aug 1, 202663 ms
Aug 8, 202664 ms
Aug 15, 202664 ms
Aug 22, 202665 ms
Aug 29, 202665 ms
Sep 5, 202664 ms
Sep 12, 202666 ms
Sep 19, 202667 ms
Sep 26, 202665 ms
Oct 3, 202670 ms
Oct 10, 202670 ms
Oct 17, 202664 ms
Oct 24, 202667 ms
Oct 31, 202663 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

www.thecoolector.com (opens in a new tab)
Full-page screenshot of thecoolector.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. thecoolector.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. thecoolector.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. thecoolector.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. thecoolector.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. thecoolector.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. thecoolector.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. thecoolector.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. thecoolector.com at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

4 to fix71

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 1.1 MB

    18 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 70 KiB

    About 70 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 229 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Skimbit and 2ea1022430effd9aef70a0e47276db2997b9b8e4.com and others), adding 188 KiB and 204 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 90 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed

  • Server response: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Your largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “The Genesis of the Supercar: 1968 Lamborghini Miura P400”.

  • Real-user TTFB: 864 ms

    864 ms

    Real visitors wait 864 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 63 ms to 63 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.09

    0.09

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.09, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 79 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix67

  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 55 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 55 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (34), fonts 229 KiB (7) and scripts 194 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9395

  • Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used (1 element)

    Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed

  • Every image has alt text

    All 78 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 26 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 27 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 26 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100

  • 167 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 167 pages on thecoolector.com and 16 external pages.

8 checks passed

  • Meta description: 131 characters

    Your meta description is 131 characters: “The Coolector is an online men's lifestyle magazine bringing your the latest in men's gear, fashion, technology, design…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The Coolector — Men’s Lifestyle Magazine: Gear, Design, Fashion & Travel”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “The Coolector | Men's Lifestyle | Design, Men's Gear & Fashion”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.thecoolector.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.thecoolector.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.thecoolector.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Other pages

1 to fix95

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://www.thecoolector.com/the-genesis-of-the-supercar-1968-lamborghini-miura-p400, https://www.thecoolector.com/pen-strokes-in-steel-spinnaker-dumas-gmt-automatic-inkdial-limited-edition-watch, https://www.thecoolector.com/strike-in-the-shadows-last-manner-x-tokyo-pipe-co-douglass-field-s-lighter, https://www.thecoolector.com/advertising, https://www.thecoolector.com/contact-us and https://www.thecoolector.com/category/mens-gear/watches and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 90 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed

  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 47 words

    The homepage has only about 47 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed

  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try again →”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Subscribe” and “Subscribe →”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 7 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thecoolector.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Freethought Internet Limited

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on thecoolector.com, including 11 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25