Website review, no card needed
thefim.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202631 issues · 76 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on thefim.org, 10 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 864 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 863 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 872 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 874 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 873 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 825 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 821 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 802 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 778 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 824 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 815 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 805 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 816 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 827 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 899 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 946 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 973 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 951 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 954 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 995 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 993 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 975 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 962 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 174 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 740 KiBAbout 740 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 68). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 528 KiB10 images could be 528 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 293 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (293 KiB).
Facebook adds 257 ms
257 msFacebook costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 304 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 194 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 34 KiBAbout 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.9 s
14.9 sYour largest element takes 14.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 20.7 s
20.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 715 ms
715 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 715 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 174 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 162 ms
162 msReal visitors wait 162 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 638 ms
638 msReal visitors wait 638 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.0 MB in 105 requests
3.0 MBYour homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 105 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (31), images 758 KiB (21) and fonts 82 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
1220x814_Website-1-500x334.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
60 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example GClogo.png at 638 px wide, shown at 66 px. Resized copies would save about 60 KiB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (339 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (91 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.85 g of CO₂e: 101.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Flint Institute of Music”, “The transformative power of the arts.For all of F…” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
118 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 118 pages on thefim.org and 15 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 31 characters
Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Home - Flint Institute of Music”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://thefim.org/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://thefim.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://thefim.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (654 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://thefim.org/your-support, https://thefim.org/capitol-theatre, https://thefim.org/whiting-auditorium, https://thefim.org/fso, https://thefim.org/flintrep and https://thefim.org/fspa and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://thefim.org/events-tickets, whose canonical is https://thefim.org/events. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
20 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 391 words of copy
The homepage carries about 391 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy Tickets” and “Register for Classes & Lessons”.
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Buy Tickets”, “Register for Classes & Lessons” and “Join the Heart of the House”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thefim.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1971
- Headquarters
- Flint Cultural Center
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on thefim.org, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.