Website review, no card needed
thefinancialstar.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202654 issues · 92 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on thefinancialstar.com, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.5 s
3.8 s
5.1 s
6.3 s
7.6 s
8.9 s
10.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.4 s · 550 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (550 KiB).
JSDelivr CDN adds 2.0 s
2.0 sJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 2.0 s of main-thread work and 66 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 13.7 s
A phone's processor spends 13.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 543 KiB and 2.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
520 ms · 476 KiBAbout 476 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 520 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
690 ms · 87 KiBAbout 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 690 ms faster on a phone.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 262 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
170 ms · 78 KiB78 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
170 ms · 15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Improve image delivery
28 KiB1 image could be 28 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 72 ms
72 msYour server sent the HTML in 72 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s
11.8 sYour largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “News Image”.
Time to Interactive: 23.1 s
23.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.852
0.852The layout shifts by 0.852 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 9.2 s
9.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
44 images without width and height
44 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 362 ms
362 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 362 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 94 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 94 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (36), scripts 1.1 MB (27) and fonts 165 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
CZCPZCHHFVAGFA6VLLPYUZ3SNY.jpg weighs 3.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
2.8 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CZCPZCHHFVAGFA6VLLPYUZ3SNY.jpg at 2,400 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 2.8 MB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (3.4 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
1770208040_shutterstock_2665169067.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.45 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.45 g of CO₂e: 174.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
32 text elements with low contrast
32 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
16 tap targets too small
16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (11 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
13 form fields without a label
13 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Links look like plain text
2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 54 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Financial Star”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Support” and “Legal & Privacy”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://thefinancialstar.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
71 internal links, 40 external
The homepage links to 71 pages on thefinancialstar.com and 40 external pages.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,142 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://thefinancialstar.com/llms.txt (181 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
16 pages share a title
/, https://thefinancialstar.com/opinion, https://thefinancialstar.com/sectors, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/11, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/10 and https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/52 and 10 others all use the title “Financial Star”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://thefinancialstar.com/opinion, https://thefinancialstar.com/sectors, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/11, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/10, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/52 and https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/66 and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 pages slow to respond
https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/11, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/10, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/52, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/66, https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/49 and https://thefinancialstar.com/page_dropdown_url/50 and 7 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
26 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,944 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,944 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “SIGN UP”, “Sign Up” and “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Taboola (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thefinancialstar.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on thefinancialstar.com, including 15 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.