Website review, no card needed
thetakeout.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202632 issues · 81 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on thetakeout.com, 7 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 4.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 850 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 882 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 908 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 927 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 941 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 907 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 901 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 892 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 892 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 907 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 897 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 912 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 907 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 892 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 886 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 881 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 881 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 888 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 904 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 911 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 933 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 947 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 959 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 960 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 943 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 186 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 184 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 198 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (adthrive.com, Google Tag Manager and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 849 KiBAbout 849 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 767 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (767 KiB).
Improve image delivery
741 KiB26 images could be 741 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
adthrive.com adds 459 ms
459 msadthrive.com costs a phone 459 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 427 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 390 ms
390 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 390 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
14 KiBAbout 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 88 but mobile only 62. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 19.6 s
19.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 936 ms
936 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 936 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sYour largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hand holding battered fried fish filet partly ripped open.”.
Speed Index: 3.8 s
3.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 194 ms to 198 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.7 s
0.7 sReal visitors wait 0.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 79 ms
79 msReal visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.7 s
0.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 339 ms
339 msReal visitors wait 339 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.8 MB in 199 requests
2.8 MBYour homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 199 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (29), images 864 KiB (42) and other files 126 KiB (115). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
14 images below the first screen load straight away
14 images further down the page (449 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
93 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example intro-1791583085.webp at 780 px wide, shown at 169 px. Resized copies would save about 93 KiB.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.80 g of CO₂e: 96.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “The Seafood Chain That's Actually Good, Despite A…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
30 links with vague text
30 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Meta description is long (216 characters)
Your meta description is 216 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
217 internal links, 26 external
The homepage links to 217 pages on thetakeout.com and 26 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “The Takeout | Food is delicious.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.thetakeout.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.thetakeout.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,755 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://pixel.rubiconproject.com/token?pid=49096&us_privacy=1YNY.
43 small tap targets
43 of 122 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener') https://www.thetakeout.com/:978:8”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 705 words of copy
The homepage carries about 705 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
71 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 71 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thetakeout.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on thetakeout.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.