Website review, no card needed

thetextilenetwork.com logo

thetextilenetwork.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on thetextilenetwork.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 244.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Oct 24, 20264.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
207 ms68 msMay 9Oct 24126 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026191 ms
May 16, 2026172 ms
May 23, 2026169 ms
May 30, 2026162 ms
Jun 6, 2026136 ms
Jun 13, 2026151 ms
Jun 20, 2026160 ms
Jun 27, 2026151 ms
Jul 4, 2026158 ms
Aug 8, 2026114 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026131 ms
Aug 29, 2026135 ms
Sep 5, 2026124 ms
Sep 12, 202684 ms
Sep 19, 202684 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 2026114 ms
Oct 10, 2026142 ms
Oct 17, 2026146 ms
Oct 24, 2026126 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of thetextilenetwork.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. thetextilenetwork.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. thetextilenetwork.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. thetextilenetwork.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. thetextilenetwork.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. thetextilenetwork.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. thetextilenetwork.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. thetextilenetwork.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. thetextilenetwork.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix46
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 518 KiB

    About 518 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 349 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 237 ms

    237 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare), adding 334 KiB and 269 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    83 KiB

    2 images could be 83 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    26 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (26 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 146 ms

    146 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 146 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    Your largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Leverage Our Platform Expertise for Your Business Growth Ad…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.373

    0.373

    The layout shifts by 0.373 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.25

    0.25

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.25 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 533 ms

    533 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 533 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 25% faster for real visitors

    -25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 191 ms to 126 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 136 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 136 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (31), images 995 KiB (80) and other files 55 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.62 g of CO₂e: 74.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8887
  • 27 text elements with low contrast

    27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 104 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 23 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 27 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10078
  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “Textile Network”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://thetextilenetwork.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 47 internal links, 35 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on thetextilenetwork.com and 35 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 107 characters

    Your meta description is 107 characters: “The all-in-one platform connecting apparel & textile companies with global buyers for endless opportunities”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Your World of Textile Business.”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://thetextilenetwork.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (657 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 15 pages share a title

    /, https://thetextilenetwork.com/company, https://thetextilenetwork.com/sourcing, https://thetextilenetwork.com/expo, https://thetextilenetwork.com/pricing and https://thetextilenetwork.com/contact and 9 others all use the title “Textile Network”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages share a meta description

    https://thetextilenetwork.com/company, https://thetextilenetwork.com/sourcing, https://thetextilenetwork.com/expo, https://thetextilenetwork.com/pricing, https://thetextilenetwork.com/contact and https://thetextilenetwork.com/blog and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://thetextilenetwork.com/company, https://thetextilenetwork.com/sourcing, https://thetextilenetwork.com/expo, https://thetextilenetwork.com/privacy-policy, https://thetextilenetwork.com/company/three-layer-sportswear and https://thetextilenetwork.com/company/texcomply and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://thetextilenetwork.com/company, https://thetextilenetwork.com/pricing and https://thetextilenetwork.com/contact have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Minified React error #418; visit https://react.dev/errors/418?args[]=text&args[]= for the full message or use the non-m…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    83 of 89 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 819 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 819 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get quote”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Get a quote” and “Contact Us”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge and “900+ Companies”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thetextilenetwork.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on thetextilenetwork.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25