Website review, no card needed

thezenith.com logo

thezenith.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202633 issues · 78 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on thezenith.com, 12 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of thezenith.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. thezenith.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. thezenith.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. thezenith.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. thezenith.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. thezenith.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. thezenith.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. thezenith.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. thezenith.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

7 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    17.1 s · 3.5 MB

    56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.5 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    9.2 s

    26 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.2 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    4.5 s · 896 KiB

    About 896 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 412 KiB

    About 412 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 62). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 386 KiB

    7 images could be 386 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 39 KiB

    39 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Accessibe Accessibility Overlay, Swiftype and JSDelivr CDN), adding 440 KiB and 169 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 154 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Document request latency

    72 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 587 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 83 ms

    83 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 83 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • First Contentful Paint: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 16.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.6 s

    20.6 s

    Your largest element takes 20.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “hp-slide-103”.

  • Speed Index: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.7 s

    20.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 11 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 66 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 66 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (23), stylesheets 985 KiB (21) and images 825 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    14 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example hp-slide-103.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 356 px. Resized copies would save about 14 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (266 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 134.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8992
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid names (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid names: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (38 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 38 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7568
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“TheZenith”, “Home” and “TheZenith Home Page”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://thezenith.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at thezenith.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 71 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 71 pages on thezenith.com and 1 external page.

2 checks passed
  • Title: 45 characters

    Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “TheZenith – Workers' Compensation Specialists”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://thezenith.com/.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (570 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    /policyholders/workers-compensation/service-expertise and /policyholders/agribusiness-solutions/service-expertise all use the title “Service Expertise – TheZenith”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /zenith/who-we-are, /zenith/contacts, /careers, /policyholders/workers-compensation/thezenith-difference, /policyholders/workers-compensation/service-expertise and /policyholders/workers-compensation/resources-support-online-tools and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8191
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 343 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 343 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Join Our Team”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Zenith Connect Demo Video” and “Join Our Team”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thezenith.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
AWS

Company

Headquarters
Woodland Hills

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on thezenith.com, including 12 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25