Website review, no card needed

thomas.co logo

thomas.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202639 issues · 87 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on thomas.co, 16 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.6 s4.2 sMay 9Oct 244.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20266.0 s
May 16, 20266.0 s
May 23, 20266.1 s
May 30, 20266.2 s
Jun 6, 20266.1 s
Jun 13, 20266.0 s
Jun 20, 20265.7 s
Jun 27, 20265.6 s
Jul 4, 20266.3 s
Jul 11, 20266.2 s
Jul 18, 20266.0 s
Jul 25, 20265.6 s
Aug 1, 20264.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.7 s
Aug 22, 20264.7 s
Aug 29, 20264.6 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.5 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.6 s
Oct 17, 20264.6 s
Oct 24, 20264.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
268 ms157 msMay 9Oct 24255 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026190 ms
May 16, 2026189 ms
May 23, 2026189 ms
May 30, 2026189 ms
Jun 6, 2026191 ms
Jun 13, 2026184 ms
Jun 20, 2026170 ms
Jun 27, 2026171 ms
Jul 4, 2026202 ms
Jul 11, 2026200 ms
Jul 18, 2026202 ms
Jul 25, 2026210 ms
Aug 1, 2026185 ms
Aug 8, 2026186 ms
Aug 15, 2026189 ms
Aug 22, 2026184 ms
Aug 29, 2026184 ms
Sep 5, 2026187 ms
Sep 12, 2026191 ms
Sep 19, 2026205 ms
Sep 26, 2026211 ms
Oct 3, 2026217 ms
Oct 10, 2026234 ms
Oct 17, 2026243 ms
Oct 24, 2026255 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of thomas.co (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. thomas.co at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. thomas.co at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. thomas.co at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. thomas.co at 4.3 s4.3 s
  5. thomas.co at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. thomas.co at 6.4 s6.4 s
  7. thomas.co at 7.5 s7.5 s
  8. thomas.co at 8.6 s8.6 s

Speed

11 to fix39
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.4 s

    41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 732 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (732 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Vimeo and Hubspot and others), adding 8.7 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Vimeo adds 456 ms

    456 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 456 ms of main-thread work and 7.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 990 ms

    990 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 990 ms of main-thread work and 558 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    720 ms · 178 KiB

    About 178 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 720 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 298 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,405 HTML elements

    The page has 2,405 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 85 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 85 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    103 KiB

    5 images could be 103 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.7 s

    27.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Deeper insights Stronger connection Tangible results”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.9 s).

  • Real-user INP: 262 ms

    262 ms

    Real visitors wait 262 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 190 ms to 255 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.0 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 9.9 MB in 245 requests

    9.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.9 MB in 245 requests on a phone: other files 5.9 MB (77), scripts 2.9 MB (90) and fonts 414 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.82 g of CO₂e: 338.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9093
  • 22 text elements with low contrast

    22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    3 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is short (20 characters)

    Your title is only 20 characters: “Homepage | Thomas.co”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 120 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 120 pages on thomas.co and 15 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Recruit and retain the right people for your business using the power of psychology and machine learning with the Thoma…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Homepage”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.thomas.co/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.thomas.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,210 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (3 KiB, 23 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /assess and /assess-accredited all use the title “Employee Assessment & Evaluation Software | Thomas.co”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    /connection-index and /our-ai have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /assess and /assess-accredited use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 76 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 849 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 849 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Pricing Plans and pricing”, “Become a partner Apply to join” and “Contact us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thomas.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on thomas.co, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25