Website review, no card needed
threatlocker.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202636 issues · 86 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on threatlocker.com, 16 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 141 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.9 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
3.4 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
13.3 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 13.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.7 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.8 s · 402 KiBAbout 402 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 526 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (526 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.2 s
A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,678 HTML elements
The page has 3,678 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, website-files.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.4 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 812 ms
812 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 812 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 769 KiB19 images could be 769 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
website-files.com adds 385 ms
385 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 385 ms of main-thread work and 3.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 316 ms
316 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 316 ms of main-thread work and 376 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 217 ms
217 msHubspot costs a phone 217 ms of main-thread work and 438 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 245 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 20.6 s
20.6 sThe first text or image appears after 20.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.9 s
28.9 sYour largest element takes 28.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Book a demo Request more info”.
Speed Index: 20.6 s
20.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 31.0 s
31.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 947 ms
947 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 947 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.151
0.151The layout shifts by 0.151 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 77 ms
77 msReal visitors wait 77 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 317 ms
317 msReal visitors wait 317 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 28% faster for real visitors
-28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.4 MB in 147 requests
8.4 MBYour homepage downloads 8.4 MB in 147 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (29), fonts 1.9 MB (27) and images 1.8 MB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
6acfe73ab58114159937ac12_ThreatLocker_Judgement Day_Website_ is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.38 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.38 g of CO₂e: 286.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h4 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 208 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Zero Trust solutions for AI, Endpoints, Cloud, an…”, “” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Corporation and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
177 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 177 pages on threatlocker.com and 18 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 134 characters
Your meta description is 134 characters: “A Zero Trust cybersecurity solutions platform, ThreatLocker delivers world-class enterprise security software and solut…”.
Title: 49 characters
Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “Enterprise Cybersecurity Solutions | ThreatLocker”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.threatlocker.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.threatlocker.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,708 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.threatlocker.com/llms.txt (8 KiB, 33 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.threatlocker.com/platform-archive declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.threatlocker.com/why-threatlocker/community is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.threatlocker.com/platform-archive all use the title “Enterprise Cybersecurity Solutions | ThreatLocker”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.threatlocker.com/capabilities has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
34 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,544 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,544 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a demo” and “Request more info”.
20 calls to action
The homepage has 20 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Start your free trial” and “Contact us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 107 testimonial or review blocks, 47 customer or partner logos and 13 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
35 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at threatlocker.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Webflow
Company
- Employees
- 700
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Orlando
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on threatlocker.com, including 20 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.