Website review, no card needed

timespro.com logo

timespro.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202631 issues · 83 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on timespro.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: google Tag Manager adds 2.0 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
565 ms479 msMay 9Oct 24554 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026532 ms
May 16, 2026534 ms
May 23, 2026529 ms
May 30, 2026539 ms
Jun 6, 2026533 ms
Jun 13, 2026526 ms
Jun 20, 2026535 ms
Jun 27, 2026520 ms
Jul 4, 2026521 ms
Jul 11, 2026517 ms
Jul 18, 2026489 ms
Jul 25, 2026498 ms
Aug 1, 2026496 ms
Aug 8, 2026503 ms
Aug 15, 2026517 ms
Aug 22, 2026532 ms
Aug 29, 2026544 ms
Sep 5, 2026547 ms
Sep 12, 2026553 ms
Sep 19, 2026537 ms
Sep 26, 2026550 ms
Oct 3, 2026552 ms
Oct 10, 2026542 ms
Oct 17, 2026555 ms
Oct 24, 2026554 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of timespro.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. timespro.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. timespro.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. timespro.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. timespro.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. timespro.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. timespro.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. timespro.com at 7.7 s7.7 s
  8. timespro.com at 8.8 s8.8 s

Speed

9 to fix44
  • Google Tag Manager adds 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 2.0 s of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and VWO and others), adding 2.0 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 816 KiB

    About 816 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    495 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (495 KiB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 371 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,587 HTML elements

    The page has 1,587 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • VWO adds 72 ms

    72 ms

    VWO costs a phone 72 ms of main-thread work and 330 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    100 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 100 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    15 KiB

    About 15 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 35 ms

    35 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 35 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.3 s

    24.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Your largest element takes 5.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Learning for Every Step of your Career”.

  • Speed Index: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 462 ms

    462 ms

    Real visitors wait 462 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 881 ms

    881 ms

    Real visitors wait 881 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 532 ms to 554 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors

    -30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.059

    0.059

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.059, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 199 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 199 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (103), other files 391 KiB (47) and fonts 165 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.02 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.02 g of CO₂e: 121.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9894
  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Online Certification Courses & Programmes for Career Growth - TimesPro”.

  • 15 links crawlers can't follow

    15 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 104 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 104 pages on timespro.com and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Explore TimesPro’s Online Certifications Courses & Training to advance your career with PGPs, Master’s Programs, Bankin…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Learning for Every Step of your Career”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://timespro.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ItemList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://timespro.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (371 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://timespro.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 646 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    https://timespro.com/course-recommendation has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://timespro.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftimesproweb-static-backend-prod.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com%2Fwebsite_banner_images_Feb26_5b91a30724_1_83ea4876bd.webp&w=384&q=75.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix71
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 459 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 459 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request a Callback”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Request a Callback” and “Contact Us”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at timespro.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on timespro.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25