Website review, no card needed
timestables.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202627 issues · 81 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on timestables.com, 8 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 943 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 949 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 955 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 964 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 965 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 965 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 968 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 973 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 975 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 984 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 987 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 987 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 983 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 975 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 982 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 997 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 957 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 939 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 939 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 943 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 140 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 446 KiBAbout 446 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 97). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and adtrafficquality.google and others), adding 1.6 MB and 524 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 500 KiB22 images could be 500 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 375 ms
375 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 375 ms of main-thread work and 577 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
bvkstatic.com adds 0 ms
0 msbvkstatic.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 705 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 40 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (40 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 12 KiBAbout 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 143 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 97 but mobile only 55. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 694 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.1 s
13.1 sYour largest element takes 13.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “At Timestables.com you can easily practice all of your tabl…”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.2 s
7.2 sThe first text or image appears after 7.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 13.3 s
13.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.8 s
7.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
82 images without width and height
82 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 94 ms
94 msReal visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 537 ms
537 msReal visitors wait 537 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 180 ms
180 msScripts block the page for only 180 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (515 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
36 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example multiplication-tables.png at 1,300 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 36 KiB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (431 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.53 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.53 g of CO₂e: 63.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 67 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 67 requests on a phone: scripts 918 KiB (14), images 708 KiB (32) and fonts 198 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
75 images without alt text
75 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (FAQPage) but with 1 problem, for example “FAQPage: a question has no acceptedAnswer.text”.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
46 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 46 pages on timestables.com and 23 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “Come and learn your multiplication tables. Improve with the 5-step plan, the tempo test, multiplication games, printabl…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Learn your multiplication tables”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Multiplication Tables with times tables games”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.timestables.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.timestables.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.timestables.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,664 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.timestables.com/teacher-parent-portal is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 40 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,531 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,531 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Sign up for free”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at timestables.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on timestables.com, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.