Website review, no card needed
toffeedev.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202631 issues · 82 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on toffeedev.com, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 10.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 10.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 10.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 10.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 308 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 292 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 287 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 326 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 544 KiBAbout 544 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 237 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (237 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 94). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, leadconnectorhq.com and WordPress and others), adding 5.3 MB and 211 ms of main-thread time.
WordPress adds 14 ms
14 msWordPress costs a phone 14 ms of main-thread work and 3.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,597 HTML elements
The page has 2,597 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
leadconnectorhq.com adds 40 ms
40 msleadconnectorhq.com costs a phone 40 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
230 KiB7 images could be 230 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
78 KiBAbout 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 94 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 735 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.5 s
9.5 sReal visitors wait 9.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 8.9 s
8.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 8.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 7.4 s
7.4 sReal visitors wait 7.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.4 s
17.4 sYour largest element takes 17.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Start Digitalize Your Marketing By Collaborating with a Tru…”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sThe first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 17.7 s
17.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.0 s
9.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 323 ms
323 msReal visitors wait 323 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 188% slower for real visitors
+188%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 10.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 308 ms to 326 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 117 ms
117 msScripts block the page for only 117 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 217 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 217 requests on a phone: images 3.8 MB (79), scripts 1.6 MB (100) and fonts 192 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (219 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.65 g of CO₂e: 198.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (3 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 79 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Corporation and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Corporation: review is an empty list”.
164 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 164 pages on toffeedev.com and 16 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 133 characters
Your meta description is 133 characters: “Digital Marketing Agency di Jakarta, Indonesia untuk SEO, iklan online, dan pembuatan website. Hubungi kami & konsultas…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Digital Marketing Agency Indonesia”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Digital Marketing Agency di Jakarta, Indonesia | ToffeeDev”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://toffeedev.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://toffeedev.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://toffeedev.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,996 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 536 words of copy
The homepage carries about 536 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 17 customer or partner logos, 67 trust badges and “0 + Clients”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at toffeedev.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on toffeedev.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.