Website review, no card needed
todimo.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202652 issues · 87 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on todimo.com.br, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 233 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 227 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 197 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 998 KiBAbout 998 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 s · 358 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (358 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 3.5 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
vtexassets.com adds 718 ms
718 msvtexassets.com costs a phone 718 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 110 KiBAbout 110 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 502 ms
502 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 502 ms of main-thread work and 518 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
450 ms · 57 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 57 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 393 ms
393 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 393 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 422 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,389 HTML elements
The page has 2,389 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Improve image delivery
19 KiB2 images could be 19 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 51 ms
51 msYour server sent the HTML in 51 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.38
0.38For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.38 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.8 s
19.8 sYour largest element takes 19.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Fecha Mês Todimo: pisos, porcelanatos, azulejos, tintas e m…”.
Time to Interactive: 29.7 s
29.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.4 s
6.4 sThe first text or image appears after 6.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.7 s
10.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 974 ms
974 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 974 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 28% slower for real visitors
+28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 849 ms
849 msReal visitors wait 849 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 173 ms
173 msReal visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 233 ms to 197 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025
0.025The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.8 MB in 145 requests
4.8 MBYour homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 145 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (56), HTML 924 KiB (3) and fonts 613 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (250 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.37 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.37 g of CO₂e: 164.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Todimo | do Básico ao Acabamento, tudo para sua Reforma ou Construção!”.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
42 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 42 pages on todimo.com.br and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 130 characters
Your meta description is 130 characters: “Pisos, porcelanatos, tintas, ferramentas, metais e material hidráulico para sua obra. Entrega rápida e até 6x sem juros…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.todimo.com.br/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.todimo.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
47%The HTML your server sends has 93 of the 198 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.todimo.com.br/Inicio-de-Obra/Gesso-Acartonado has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.todimo.com.br/Inicio-de-Obra/Material-Basico, whose canonical is https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/material-basico. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.todimo.com.br/climatizacao, https://www.todimo.com.br/casa-e-lazer, https://www.todimo.com.br/Inicio-de-Obra/Material-Basico, https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/material-basico/areia-pedra-e-bloco-ceramico, https://www.todimo.com.br/Inicio-de-Obra/Cimentos and https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/cimentos/cimento and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/material-basico/areia-pedra-e-bloco-ceramico, https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/cimentos/cimento, https://www.todimo.com.br/Inicio-de-Obra/Ferragens, https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/ferragens/vergalhoes---barra-de-ferro, https://www.todimo.com.br/inicio-de-obra/ferragens/arames and https://www.todimo.com.br/Inicio-de-Obra/Forros took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
16 small tap targets
16 of 46 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_INVALID_URL”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 198 words
The homepage has only about 198 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
25 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at todimo.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on todimo.com.br, including 24 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.