Website review, no card needed

topstempel.at logo

topstempel.at website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202629 issues · 82 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on topstempel.at, 6 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: 1 linked page is broken. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s1.1 sMay 23Oct 311.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
115 ms71 msMay 23Oct 3197 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202688 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026110 ms
Jun 20, 2026109 ms
Jun 27, 2026109 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202690 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Sep 5, 202679 ms
Sep 12, 202676 ms
Sep 19, 202679 ms
Sep 26, 202689 ms
Oct 3, 202688 ms
Oct 10, 202694 ms
Oct 17, 202691 ms
Oct 24, 202690 ms
Oct 31, 202697 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of topstempel.at (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. topstempel.at at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. topstempel.at at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. topstempel.at at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. topstempel.at at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. topstempel.at at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. topstempel.at at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. topstempel.at at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. topstempel.at at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix84
  • Mobile performance score: 84

    84/100

    Your mobile performance score is 84. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 633 KiB

    23 images could be 633 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 200 KiB

    About 200 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,974 HTML elements

    The page has 1,974 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Shopify adds 34 ms

    34 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 34 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • vimando.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    vimando.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Shopify and Judge.me and others), adding 657 KiB and 149 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    About 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    14 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • 36 images without width and height

    36 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Speed Index: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 88 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Real visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 397 ms

    397 ms

    Real visitors wait 397 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 55 ms

    55 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 55 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 230 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 230 requests on a phone: other files 1.1 MB (133), images 1.0 MB (46) and scripts 497 KiB (34). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    30 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example search_related.png at 400 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (272 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (259 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 97.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9489
  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 15 links without text

    15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 23 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 24 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9286
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Stempel bestellen” and “STEMPEL BESTELLEN BEI topstempel.at”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 278 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 278 pages on topstempel.at and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Stempel online bestellen, einfach und günstig. & Online Text Editor & Grafik-Upload & Top Preise & Bis 14h bestellt, am…”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Stempel bestellen (Trodat | Colop) im schnellsten Stempelshop”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://topstempel.at/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://topstempel.at/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://topstempel.at/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,646 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix67
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://topstempel.at/contact, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://topstempel.at/pages/designer and https://topstempel.at/pages/designer/image all use the title “Stempel mit eigenem Text individuell gestalten”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://topstempel.at/pages/designer and https://topstempel.at/pages/designer/image use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=355050464&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=311a2b15-7a42-4da4-a9d5-41d9c076fde0&bo=2&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Stempel%20bestellen%20(Trodat%20%7C%20Colop).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    31 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,306 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,306 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “zum Shop”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “zum Shop”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 124 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 4 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at topstempel.at, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 2 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Judge Me Reviews · Microsoft Clarity

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on topstempel.at, including 12 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25